mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Truth Discovery in Sequence Labels from Crowds

arXiv 2109.04470 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2021cs.HC cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Annotation quality and quantity positively affect the learning performance of sequence labeling, a vital task in Natural Language Processing. Hiring domain experts to annotate a corpus is very costly in terms of money and time. Crowdsourcing platforms, such as Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT), have been deployed to assist in this purpose. However, the annotations collected this way are prone to human errors due to the lack of expertise of the crowd workers. Existing literature in annotation aggregation assumes that annotations are independent and thus faces challenges when handling the sequential label aggregation tasks with complex dependencies. To conquer the challenges, we propose an optimization-based method that infers the ground truth labels using annotations provided by workers for sequential labeling tasks. The proposed Aggregation method for Sequential Labels from Crowds (AggSLC) jointly considers the characteristics of sequential labeling tasks, workers' reliabilities, and advanced machine learning techniques. Theoretical analysis on the algorithm's convergence further demonstrates that the proposed AggSLC halts after a finite number of iterations. We evaluate AggSLC on different crowdsourced datasets for Named Entity Recognition (NER) tasks and Information Extraction tasks in biomedical (PICO), as well as a simulated dataset. Our results show that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art aggregation methods. To achieve insights into the framework, we study the effectiveness of AggSLC's components through ablation studies.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2021.

Builds on

17 of 54 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  4. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  5. 2016Neural Architectures for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 548
  6. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  7. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
  8. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
  9. 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
  10. 2017Deep learning from crowdscited by 105
  11. 2015Webly Supervised Learning of Convolutional Networkscited by 95
  12. 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
5 more
  1. 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 87
  2. 2017Who Said What: Modeling Individual Labelers Improves Classificationcited by 77
  3. 2017Deep Learning from Noisy Image Labels with Quality Embeddingcited by 46
  4. 2015A Survey on Truth Discoverycited by 36
  5. 2019Learning to Contextually Aggregate Multi-Source Supervision for Sequence Labelingcited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 1.

6 papers.