mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can Noise on Qubits Be Learned in Quantum Neural Network? A Case Study on QuantumFlow

arXiv 2109.03430 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2021quant-ph cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era, one of the key questions is how to deal with the high noise level existing in physical quantum bits (qubits). Quantum error correction is promising but requires an extensive number (e.g., over 1,000) of physical qubits to create one "perfect" qubit, exceeding the capacity of the existing quantum computers. This paper aims to tackle the noise issue from another angle: instead of creating perfect qubits for general quantum algorithms, we investigate the potential to mitigate the noise issue for dedicate algorithms. Specifically, this paper targets quantum neural network (QNN), and proposes to learn the errors in the training phase, so that the identified QNN model can be resilient to noise. As a result, the implementation of QNN needs no or a small number of additional physical qubits, which is more realistic for the near-term quantum computers. To achieve this goal, an application-specific compiler is essential: on the one hand, the error cannot be learned if the mapping from logical qubits to physical qubits exists randomness; on the other hand, the compiler needs to be efficient so that the lengthy training procedure can be completed in a reasonable time. In this paper, we utilize the recent QNN framework, QuantumFlow, as a case study. Experimental results show that the proposed approach can optimize QNN models for different errors in qubits, achieving up to 28% accuracy improvement compared with the model obtained by the error-agnostic training.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2021.

Builds on

15 of 31 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
  2. 2021QuantumNAS: Noise-Adaptive Search for Robust Quantum Circuitscited by 97
  3. 2020Co-Exploration of Neural Architectures and Heterogeneous ASIC Accelerator Designs Targeting Multiple Taskscited by 43
  4. 2019Accuracy vs. Efficiency: Achieving Both through FPGA-Implementation Aware Neural Architecture Searchcited by 38
  5. 2019Device-Circuit-Architecture Co-Exploration for Computing-in-Memory Neural Acceleratorscited by 32
  6. 2020A Co-Design Framework of Neural Networks and Quantum Circuits Towards Quantum Advantagecited by 23
  7. 2019Noise-Adaptive Compiler Mappings for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Computerscited by 22
  8. 2020Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Hardware and Neural Architecture Co-Search with Hot Startcited by 22
  9. 2019Achieving Super-Linear Speedup across Multi-FPGA for Real-Time DNN Inferencecited by 13
  10. 2019On the qubit routing problemcited by 11
  11. 2020When Machine Learning Meets Quantum Computers: A Case Studycited by 9
  12. 2021Dancing along Battery: Enabling Transformer with Run-time Reconfigurability on Mobile Devicescited by 9
3 more
  1. 2020Optimal Layout Synthesis for Quantum Computingcited by 6
  2. 2020A Hardware-Aware Heuristic for the Qubit Mapping Problem in the NISQ Eracited by 5
  3. 2021Quantum Accelerator Stack: A Research Roadmapcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 6; 2024: 2.

13 papers.

Sort: