A Decoupled Uncertainty Model for MRI Segmentation Quality Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quality control (QC) of MR images is essential to ensure that downstream analyses such as segmentation can be performed successfully. Currently, QC is predominantly performed visually and subjectively, at significant time and operator cost. We aim to automate the process using a probabilistic network that estimates segmentation uncertainty through a heteroscedastic noise model, providing a measure of task-specific quality. By augmenting training images with k-space artefacts, we propose a novel CNN architecture to decouple sources of uncertainty related to the task and different k-space artefacts in a self-supervised manner. This enables the prediction of separate uncertainties for different types of data degradation. While the uncertainty predictions reflect the presence and severity of artefacts, the network provides more robust and generalisable segmentation predictions given the quality of the data. We show that models trained with artefact augmentation provide informative measures of uncertainty on both simulated artefacts and problematic real-world images identified by human raters, both qualitatively and quantitatively in the form of error bars on volume measurements. Relating artefact uncertainty to segmentation Dice scores, we observe that our uncertainty predictions provide a better estimate of MRI quality from the point of view of the task (gray matter segmentation) compared to commonly used metrics of quality including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), hence providing a real-time quality metric indicative of segmentation quality.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2021.
Builds on
26 of 42 references.
References · 26
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,527
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,358
- 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
- 2018A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Imagescited by 283
14 more
- 2018Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networkscited by 280
- 2017NiftyNet: a deep-learning platform for medical imagingcited by 45
- 2018Leveraging Uncertainty Estimates for Predicting Segmentation Qualitycited by 44
- 2019Supervised Uncertainty Quantification for Segmentation with Multiple Annotationscited by 42
- 2018Bayesian QuickNAT: Model Uncertainty in Deep Whole-Brain Segmentation for Structure-wise Quality Controlcited by 39
- 2020Deep Generative Model-based Quality Control for Cardiac MRI Segmentationcited by 22
- 2019Let's agree to disagree: learning highly debatable multirater labellingcited by 16
- 2020MRQy: An Open-Source Tool for Quality Control of MR Imaging Datacited by 12
- 2019Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning for Safer Neuroimage Enhancementcited by 9
- 2018Uncertainty in multitask learning: joint representations for probabilistic MR-only radiotherapy planningcited by 8
- 2020A Heteroscedastic Uncertainty Model for Decoupling Sources of MRI Image Qualitycited by 7
- 2019As easy as 1, 2... 4? Uncertainty in counting tasks for medical imagingcited by 6
- 2019Dual Neural Network Architecture for Determining Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertaintiescited by 2
- 2020A deep learning-based pipeline for error detection and quality control of brain MRI segmentation resultscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022Trustworthy clinical AI solutions: a unified review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning models for medical image analysiscited by 63
- 2021QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Resultscited by 28
- 2024Automated MRI Quality Assessment of Brain T1-weighted MRI in Clinical Data Warehouses: A Transfer Learning Approach Relying on Artefact Simulationcited by 1
- 2024Automated MRI Quality Assessment of Brain T1-weighted MRI in Clinical Data Warehouses: A Transfer Learning Approach Relying on Artefact Simulation18 Jun 2024
- 2022Trustworthy clinical AI solutions: a unified review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning models for medical image analysis5 Oct 2022
- 2021QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Results19 Dec 2021