Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning for Safer Neuroimage Enhancement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning (DL) has shown great potential in medical image enhancement problems, such as super-resolution or image synthesis. However, to date, little consideration has been given to uncertainty quantification over the output image. Here we introduce methods to characterise different components of uncertainty in such problems and demonstrate the ideas using diffusion MRI super-resolution. Specifically, we propose to account for intrinsic uncertainty through a heteroscedastic noise model and for parameter uncertainty through approximate Bayesian inference, and integrate the two to quantify predictive uncertainty over the output image. Moreover, we introduce a method to propagate the predictive uncertainty on a multi-channelled image to derived scalar parameters, and separately quantify the effects of intrinsic and parameter uncertainty therein. The methods are evaluated for super-resolution of two different signal representations of diffusion MR images---DTIs and Mean Apparent Propagator MRI---and their derived quantities such as MD and FA, on multiple datasets of both healthy and pathological human brains. Results highlight three key benefits of uncertainty modelling for improving the safety of DL-based image enhancement systems. Firstly, incorporating uncertainty improves the predictive performance even when test data departs from training data. Secondly, the predictive uncertainty highly correlates with errors, and is therefore capable of detecting predictive "failures". Results demonstrate that such an uncertainty measure enables subject-specific and voxel-wise risk assessment of the output images. Thirdly, we show that the method for decomposing predictive uncertainty into its independent sources provides high-level "explanations" for the performance by quantifying how much uncertainty arises from the inherent difficulty of the task or the limited training examples.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2023A Review of Uncertainty Estimation and its Application in Medical Imagingcited by 59
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification for Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Surveycited by 14
- 2024Diffusion MRI with Machine Learningcited by 11
- 2022Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Unrolling-Based Computational Imagingcited by 10
- 2025Conformalized Generative Bayesian Imaging: An Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Computational Imagingcited by 5
- 2021A Decoupled Uncertainty Model for MRI Segmentation Quality Estimationcited by 3
- 2025Few-Shot Multimodal Medical Imaging: A Theoretical Frameworkcited by 0
- 2026Pixelwise Uncertainty Quantification of Accelerated MRI Reconstructioncited by 0
- 2026CUPA-T2*: Covariance-Aware Uncertainty Propagation and Alignment for T2* Mapping in Accelerated MRIcited by 0
- 2026CUPA-T2*: Covariance-Aware Uncertainty Propagation and Alignment for T2* Mapping in Accelerated MRI9 Aug 2026
- 2026Pixelwise Uncertainty Quantification of Accelerated MRI Reconstruction19 Jan 2026
- 2025Few-Shot Multimodal Medical Imaging: A Theoretical Framework3 Nov 2025
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification for Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Survey4 May 2025
- 2025Conformalized Generative Bayesian Imaging: An Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Computational Imaging10 Apr 2025
- 2024Diffusion MRI with Machine Learning1 Jan 2024
- 2023A Review of Uncertainty Estimation and its Application in Medical Imaging16 Feb 2023
- 2022Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Unrolling-Based Computational Imaging2 Jul 2022
- 2021A Decoupled Uncertainty Model for MRI Segmentation Quality Estimation6 Sep 2021