A Generative Approach for Mitigating Structural Biases in Natural Language Inference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many natural language inference (NLI) datasets contain biases that allow models to perform well by only using a biased subset of the input, without considering the remainder features. For instance, models are able to make a classification decision by only using the hypothesis, without learning the true relationship between it and the premise. These structural biases lead discriminative models to learn unintended superficial features and to generalize poorly out of the training distribution. In this work, we reformulate the NLI task as a generative task, where a model is conditioned on the biased subset of the input and the label and generates the remaining subset of the input. We show that by imposing a uniform prior, we obtain a provably unbiased model. Through synthetic experiments, we find that this approach is highly robust to large amounts of bias. We then demonstrate empirically on two types of natural bias that this approach leads to fully unbiased models in practice. However, we find that generative models are difficult to train and they generally perform worse than discriminative baselines. We highlight the difficulty of the generative modeling task in the context of NLI as a cause for this worse performance. Finally, by fine-tuning the generative model with a discriminative objective, we reduce the performance gap between the generative model and the discriminative baseline, while allowing for a small amount of bias.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2021.
Builds on
35 of 52 references.
References · 35
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,847
- 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 876
23 more
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 671
- 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 547
- 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 491
- 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
- 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 402
- 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 339
- 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 295
- 2018Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systemscited by 234
- 2019Leveraging Pre-trained Checkpoints for Sequence Generation Taskscited by 182
- 2019Towards Debiasing Fact Verification Modelscited by 143
- 2018Deep Learning for Sentiment Analysis : A Surveycited by 139
- 2019End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in Corporacited by 128
- 2019Unlearn Dataset Bias in Natural Language Inference by Fitting the Residualcited by 119
- 2020Towards Debiasing NLU Models from Unknown Biasescited by 116
- 2018The Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER) Shared Taskcited by 108
- 2018How Much Reading Does Reading Comprehension Require? A Critical Investigation of Popular Benchmarkscited by 88
- 2020Mind the Trade-off: Debiasing NLU Models without Degrading the In-distribution Performancecited by 85
- 2020Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling themcited by 83
- 2018Performance Impact Caused by Hidden Bias of Training Data for Recognizing Textual Entailmentcited by 59
- 2019Don't Take the Premise for Granted: Mitigating Artifacts in Natural Language Inferencecited by 49
- 2018Explicit Bias Discovery in Visual Question Answering Modelscited by 42
- 2019On Adversarial Removal of Hypothesis-only Bias in Natural Language Inferencecited by 29
- 2017Survey of Visual Question Answering: Datasets and Techniquescited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Think Twice: Measuring the Efficiency of Eliminating Prediction Shortcuts of Question Answering Modelscited by 6
- 2022Uncovering More Shallow Heuristics: Probing the Natural Language Inference Capacities of Transformer-Based Pre-Trained Language Models Using Syllogistic Patternscited by 3
- 2022Looking at the Overlooked: An Analysis on the Word-Overlap Bias in Natural Language Inferencecited by 3
- 2023Think Twice: Measuring the Efficiency of Eliminating Prediction Shortcuts of Question Answering Models11 May 2023
- 2022Looking at the Overlooked: An Analysis on the Word-Overlap Bias in Natural Language Inference7 Nov 2022
- 2022Uncovering More Shallow Heuristics: Probing the Natural Language Inference Capacities of Transformer-Based Pre-Trained Language Models Using Syllogistic Patterns19 Jan 2022