mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exploring the Capacity of a Large-scale Masked Language Model to Recognize Grammatical Errors

arXiv 2108.12216 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2021cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we explore the capacity of a language model-based method for grammatical error detection in detail. We first show that 5 to 10% of training data are enough for a BERT-based error detection method to achieve performance equivalent to a non-language model-based method can achieve with the full training data; recall improves much faster with respect to training data size in the BERT-based method than in the non-language model method while precision behaves similarly. These suggest that (i) the BERT-based method should have a good knowledge of grammar required to recognize certain types of error and that (ii) it can transform the knowledge into error detection rules by fine-tuning with a few training samples, which explains its high generalization ability in grammatical error detection. We further show with pseudo error data that it actually exhibits such nice properties in learning rules for recognizing various types of error. Finally, based on these findings, we explore a cost-effective method for detecting grammatical errors with feedback comments explaining relevant grammatical rules to learners.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2021.

Builds on

11 of 29 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
  3. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
  4. 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 320
  5. 2020Encoder-Decoder Models Can Benefit from Pre-trained Masked Language Models in Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 59
  6. 2021How is BERT surprised? Layerwise detection of linguistic anomaliescited by 24
  7. 2017Semi-supervised Multitask Learning for Sequence Labelingcited by 20
  8. 2019Context is Key: Grammatical Error Detection with Contextual Word Representationscited by 14
  9. 2019Multi-Head Multi-Layer Attention to Deep Language Representations for Grammatical Error Detectioncited by 7
  10. 2021Do Grammatical Error Correction Models Realize Grammatical Generalization?cited by 6
  11. 2017Auxiliary Objectives for Neural Error Detection Modelscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.