A Comprehensive Evaluation and Analysis Study for Chinese Spelling Check
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the development of pre-trained models and the incorporation of phonetic and graphic information, neural models have achieved high scores in Chinese Spelling Check (CSC). However, it does not provide a comprehensive reflection of the models' capability due to the limited test sets. In this study, we abstract the representative model paradigm, implement it with nine structures and experiment them on comprehensive test sets we constructed with different purposes. We perform a detailed analysis of the results and find that: 1) Fusing phonetic and graphic information reasonably is effective for CSC. 2) Models are sensitive to the error distribution of the test set, which reflects the shortcomings of models and reveals the direction we should work on. 3) Whether or not the errors and contexts have been seen has a significant impact on models. 4) The commonly used benchmark, SIGHAN, can not reliably evaluate models' performance.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2023.
Builds on
15 of 33 references.
References · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2017Natural TTS Synthesis by Conditioning WaveNet on Mel Spectrogram Predictionscited by 800
- 2020Spelling Error Correction with Soft-Masked BERTcited by 90
- 2019A spelling correction model for end-to-end speech recognitioncited by 63
- 2020SpellGCN: Incorporating Phonological and Visual Similarities into Language Models for Chinese Spelling Checkcited by 57
- 2021Read, Listen, and See: Leveraging Multimodal Information Helps Chinese Spell Checkingcited by 52
3 more
- 2020Domain-shift Conditioning using Adaptable Filtering via Hierarchical Embeddings for Robust Chinese Spell Checkcited by 8
- 2021Do Grammatical Error Correction Models Realize Grammatical Generalization?cited by 6
- 2021Exploring the Capacity of a Large-scale Masked Language Model to Recognize Grammatical Errorscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.