Auxiliary Objectives for Neural Error Detection Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate the utility of different auxiliary objectives and training strategies within a neural sequence labeling approach to error detection in learner writing. Auxiliary costs provide the model with additional linguistic information, allowing it to learn general-purpose compositional features that can then be exploited for other objectives. Our experiments show that a joint learning approach trained with parallel labels on in-domain data improves performance over the previous best error detection system. While the resulting model has the same number of parameters, the additional objectives allow it to be optimised more efficiently and achieve better performance.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Grammatical Error Correction: A Survey of the State of the Artcited by 43
- 2021Exploring the Capacity of a Large-scale Masked Language Model to Recognize Grammatical Errorscited by 2
- 2023Learning under Label Proportions for Text Classificationcited by 1
- 2024Leveraging LLMs for Bangla Grammar Error Correction:Error Categorization, Synthetic Data, and Model Evaluationcited by 0
- 2024Leveraging LLMs for Bangla Grammar Error Correction:Error Categorization, Synthetic Data, and Model Evaluation20 Jun 2024
- 2023Learning under Label Proportions for Text Classification18 Oct 2023
- 2022Grammatical Error Correction: A Survey of the State of the Art9 Nov 2022
- 2021Exploring the Capacity of a Large-scale Masked Language Model to Recognize Grammatical Errors27 Aug 2021