Understanding the Logit Distributions of Adversarially-Trained Deep Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial defenses train deep neural networks to be invariant to the input perturbations from adversarial attacks. Almost all defense strategies achieve this invariance through adversarial training i.e. training on inputs with adversarial perturbations. Although adversarial training is successful at mitigating adversarial attacks, the behavioral differences between adversarially-trained (AT) models and standard models are still poorly understood. Motivated by a recent study on learning robustness without input perturbations by distilling an AT model, we explore what is learned during adversarial training by analyzing the distribution of logits in AT models. We identify three logit characteristics essential to learning adversarial robustness. First, we provide a theoretical justification for the finding that adversarial training shrinks two important characteristics of the logit distribution: the max logit values and the "logit gaps" (difference between the logit max and next largest values) are on average lower for AT models. Second, we show that AT and standard models differ significantly on which samples are high or low confidence, then illustrate clear qualitative differences by visualizing samples with the largest confidence difference. Finally, we find learning information about incorrect classes to be essential to learning robustness by manipulating the non-max logit information during distillation and measuring the impact on the student's robustness. Our results indicate that learning some adversarial robustness without input perturbations requires a model to learn specific sample-wise confidences and incorrect class orderings that follow complex distributions.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2021.
Builds on
35 of 43 references.
References · 35
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,603
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
23 more
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 678
- 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 555
- 2018Born Again Neural Networkscited by 546
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
- 2017PixelDefend: Leveraging Generative Models to Understand and Defend against Adversarial Examplescited by 244
- 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 243
- 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
- 2021Towards Understanding Knowledge Distillationcited by 158
- 2019Adversarially Robust Distillationcited by 125
- 2020Adversarial Machine Learning -- Industry Perspectivescited by 122
- 2020Shape-Texture Debiased Neural Network Trainingcited by 76
- 2017Classification and Geometry of General Perceptual Manifoldscited by 62
- 2018Evaluating and Understanding the Robustness of Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 34
- 2018Logit Pairing Methods Can Fool Gradient-Based Attackscited by 27
- 2019Label Smoothing and Logit Squeezing: A Replacement for Adversarial Training?cited by 18
- 2020Untangling in Invariant Speech Recognitioncited by 13
- 2020Label Smoothing and Adversarial Robustnesscited by 10
- 2019Improved Adversarial Robustness via Logit Regularization Methodscited by 3
- 2020Rethinking Uncertainty in Deep Learning: Whether and How it Improves Robustnesscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2022Towards Alternative Techniques for Improving Adversarial Robustness: Analysis of Adversarial Training at a Spectrum of Perturbations
- 2022Threat Model-Agnostic Adversarial Defense using Diffusion Models
- 2023Adversarial defense based on distribution transfer
- 2021Understanding Robustness in Teacher-Student Setting: A New Perspective
- 2024Rethinking Invariance Regularization in Adversarial Training to Improve Robustness-Accuracy Trade-off
- 2023Raising the Bar for Certified Adversarial Robustness with Diffusion Models
- 2021Revisiting Adversarial Robustness Distillation: Robust Soft Labels Make Student Better
- 2026Toward Understanding Adversarial Distillation: Why Robust Teachers Fail