Label Smoothing and Adversarial Robustness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent studies indicate that current adversarial attack methods are flawed and easy to fail when encountering some deliberately designed defense. Sometimes even a slight modification in the model details will invalidate the attack. We find that training model with label smoothing can easily achieve striking accuracy under most gradient-based attacks. For instance, the robust accuracy of a WideResNet model trained with label smoothing on CIFAR-10 achieves 75% at most under PGD attack. To understand the reason underlying the subtle robustness, we investigate the relationship between label smoothing and adversarial robustness. Through theoretical analysis about the characteristics of the network trained with label smoothing and experiment verification of its performance under various attacks. We demonstrate that the robustness produced by label smoothing is incomplete based on the fact that its defense effect is volatile, and it cannot defend attacks transferred from a naturally trained model. Our study enlightens the research community to rethink how to evaluate the model's robustness appropriately.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021RobustART: Benchmarking Robustness on Architecture Design and Training Techniquescited by 78
- 2025AutoAdvExBench: Benchmarking autonomous exploitation of adversarial example defensescited by 14
- 2021Real World Robustness from Systematic Noisecited by 5
- 2022In and Out-of-Domain Text Adversarial Robustness via Label Smoothingcited by 5
- 2022Masked Spatial-Spectral Autoencoders Are Excellent Hyperspectral Defenderscited by 4
- 2021Understanding the Logit Distributions of Adversarially-Trained Deep Neural Networkscited by 2
- 2022Adversarial Ensemble Training by Jointly Learning Label Dependencies and Member Modelscited by 2
- 2022Guidance Through Surrogate: Towards a Generic Diagnostic Attackcited by 1
- 2024Impact of Regularization on Calibration and Robustness: from the Representation Space Perspectivecited by 1
- 2024Batch-in-Batch: a new adversarial training framework for initial perturbation and sample selectioncited by 0
- 2025AutoAdvExBench: Benchmarking autonomous exploitation of adversarial example defenses3 Mar 2025
- 2024Impact of Regularization on Calibration and Robustness: from the Representation Space Perspective5 Oct 2024
- 2024Batch-in-Batch: a new adversarial training framework for initial perturbation and sample selection6 Jun 2024
- 2022Guidance Through Surrogate: Towards a Generic Diagnostic Attack30 Dec 2022
- 2022In and Out-of-Domain Text Adversarial Robustness via Label Smoothing20 Dec 2022
- 2022Masked Spatial-Spectral Autoencoders Are Excellent Hyperspectral Defenders16 Jul 2022
- 2022Adversarial Ensemble Training by Jointly Learning Label Dependencies and Member Models29 Jun 2022
- 2021RobustART: Benchmarking Robustness on Architecture Design and Training Techniques11 Sep 2021
- 2021Real World Robustness from Systematic Noise2 Sep 2021
- 2021Understanding the Logit Distributions of Adversarially-Trained Deep Neural Networks26 Aug 2021