mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Probing Pre-trained Auto-regressive Language Models for Named Entity Typing and Recognition

arXiv 2108.11857 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2021cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite impressive results of language models for named entity recognition (NER), their generalization to varied textual genres, a growing entity type set, and new entities remains a challenge. Collecting thousands of annotations in each new case for training or fine-tuning is expensive and time-consuming. In contrast, humans can easily identify named entities given some simple instructions. Inspired by this, we challenge the reliance on large datasets and study pre-trained language models for NER in a meta-learning setup. First, we test named entity typing (NET) in a zero-shot transfer scenario. Then, we perform NER by giving few examples at inference. We propose a method to select seen and rare / unseen names when having access only to the pre-trained model and report results on these groups. The results show: auto-regressive language models as meta-learners can perform NET and NER fairly well especially for regular or seen names; name irregularity when often present for a certain entity type can become an effective exploitable cue; names with words foreign to the model have the most negative impact on results; the model seems to rely more on name than context cues in few-shot NER.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2021.

Builds on

21 of 35 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
  5. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
  6. 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
  7. 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
  8. 2019A Unified MRC Framework for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 199
  9. 2021Few-NERD: A Few-Shot Named Entity Recognition Datasetcited by 150
  10. 2019A Survey on Recent Advances in Named Entity Recognition from Deep Learning modelscited by 117
  11. 2018Learning Named Entity Tagger using Domain-Specific Dictionarycited by 65
  12. 2020Named Entity Recognition without Labelled Data: A Weak Supervision Approachcited by 46
9 more
  1. 2020"You are grounded!": Latent Name Artifacts in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 39
  2. 2020Rethinking Generalization of Neural Models: A Named Entity Recognition Case Studycited by 35
  3. 2020TriggerNER: Learning with Entity Triggers as Explanations for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 30
  4. 2020Coarse-to-Fine Pre-training for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 28
  5. 2019Zero-Shot Open Entity Typing as Type-Compatible Groundingcited by 19
  6. 2019A Multi-task Approach for Named Entity Recognition in Social Media Datacited by 18
  7. 2020Contextualized Embeddings in Named-Entity Recognition: An Empirical Study on Generalizationcited by 15
  8. 2020MZET: Memory Augmented Zero-Shot Fine-grained Named Entity Typingcited by 12
  9. 2019Modeling Noisiness to Recognize Named Entities using Multitask Neural Networks on Social Mediacited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

10 papers.