mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Self-Supervised Delineation of Geological Structures using Orthogonal Latent Space Projection

arXiv 2108.09605 ↗First posted 22 Aug 2021physics.geo-ph cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We developed two machine learning frameworks that could assist in automated litho-stratigraphic interpretation of seismic volumes without any manual hand labeling from an experienced seismic interpreter. The first framework is an unsupervised hierarchical clustering model to divide seismic images from a volume into certain number of clusters determined by the algorithm. The clustering framework uses a combination of density and hierarchical techniques to determine the size and homogeneity of the clusters. The second framework consists of a self-supervised deep learning framework to label regions of geological interest in seismic images. It projects the latent-space of an encoder-decoder architecture unto two orthogonal subspaces, from which it learns to delineate regions of interest in the seismic images. To demonstrate an application of both frameworks, a seismic volume was clustered into various contiguous clusters, from which four clusters were selected based on distinct seismic patterns: horizons, faults, salt domes and chaotic structures. Images from the selected clusters are used to train the encoder-decoder network. The output of the encoder-decoder network is a probability map of the possibility an amplitude reflection event belongs to an interesting geological structure. The structures are delineated using the probability map. The delineated images are further used to post-train a segmentation model to extend our results to full-vertical sections. The results on vertical sections show that we can factorize a seismic volume into its corresponding structural components. Lastly, we showed that our deep learning framework could be modeled as an attribute extractor and we compared our attribute result with various existing attributes in literature and demonstrate competitive performance with them.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2021.

Builds on

9 of 45 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017Towards Deeper Understanding of Variational Autoencoding Modelscited by 56
  2. 2019Composite Shape Modeling via Latent Space Factorizationcited by 31
  3. 2019A Machine Learning Benchmark for Facies Classificationcited by 27
  4. 2019Semi-supervised Sequence Modeling for Elastic Impedance Inversioncited by 10
  5. 2019Semi-Supervised Segmentation of Salt Bodies in Seismic Images using an Ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 9
  6. 2019Structure Label Prediction Using Similarity-Based Retrieval and Weakly-Supervised Label Mappingcited by 9
  7. 2017Seismic facies recognition based on prestack data using deep convolutional autoencodercited by 5
  8. 2018The role of visual saliency in the automation of seismic interpretationcited by 5
  9. 2018Content-adaptive non-parametric texture similarity measurecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.