mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust outlier detection by de-biasing VAE likelihoods

arXiv 2108.08760 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2021cs.LG cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep networks often make confident, yet, incorrect, predictions when tested with outlier data that is far removed from their training distributions. Likelihoods computed by deep generative models (DGMs) are a candidate metric for outlier detection with unlabeled data. Yet, previous studies have shown that DGM likelihoods are unreliable and can be easily biased by simple transformations to input data. Here, we examine outlier detection with variational autoencoders (VAEs), among the simplest of DGMs. We propose novel analytical and algorithmic approaches to ameliorate key biases with VAE likelihoods. Our bias corrections are sample-specific, computationally inexpensive, and readily computed for various decoder visible distributions. Next, we show that a well-known image pre-processing technique -- contrast stretching -- extends the effectiveness of bias correction to further improve outlier detection. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art accuracies with nine grayscale and natural image datasets, and demonstrates significant advantages -- both with speed and performance -- over four recent, competing approaches. In summary, lightweight remedies suffice to achieve robust outlier detection with VAEs.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2021.

Builds on

20 of 29 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  3. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  4. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  5. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  6. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  7. 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,048
  8. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
  9. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
  10. 2016Pixel Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 814
  11. 2015Importance Weighted Autoencoderscited by 454
  12. 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 451
8 more
  1. 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
  2. 2017PixelCNN++: Improving the PixelCNN with Discretized Logistic Mixture Likelihood and Other Modificationscited by 415
  3. 2020Why Normalizing Flows Fail to Detect Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 220
  4. 2019Input complexity and out-of-distribution detection with likelihood-based generative modelscited by 186
  5. 2020Likelihood Regret: An Out-of-Distribution Detection Score For Variational Auto-encodercited by 145
  6. 2015A Large-Scale Car Dataset for Fine-Grained Categorization and Verificationcited by 129
  7. 2019The continuous Bernoulli: fixing a pervasive error in variational autoencoderscited by 40
  8. 2021Bayesian Autoencoders: Analysing and Fixing the Bernoulli likelihood for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

8 papers.