Inverse design optimization framework via a two-step deep learning approach: application to a wind turbine airfoil
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The inverse approach is computationally efficient in aerodynamic design as the desired target performance distribution is prespecified. However, it has some significant limitations that prevent it from achieving full efficiency. First, the iterative procedure should be repeated whenever the specified target distribution changes. Target distribution optimization can be performed to clarify the ambiguity in specifying this distribution, but several additional problems arise in this process such as loss of the representation capacity due to parameterization of the distribution, excessive constraints for a realistic distribution, inaccuracy of quantities of interest due to theoretical/empirical predictions, and the impossibility of explicitly imposing geometric constraints. To deal with these issues, a novel inverse design optimization framework with a two-step deep learning approach is proposed. A variational autoencoder and multi-layer perceptron are used to generate a realistic target distribution and predict the quantities of interest and shape parameters from the generated distribution, respectively. Then, target distribution optimization is performed as the inverse design optimization. The proposed framework applies active learning and transfer learning techniques to improve accuracy and efficiency. Finally, the framework is validated through aerodynamic shape optimizations of the wind turbine airfoil. Their results show that this framework is accurate, efficient, and flexible to be applied to other inverse design engineering applications.
Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2021.
Builds on
11 of 59 references.
References · 11
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
- 2015Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trickcited by 489
- 2020pymoo: Multi-objective Optimization in Pythoncited by 196
- 2019Stabilizing Generative Adversarial Networks: A Surveycited by 57
- 2020Airfoil Design Parameterization and Optimization using B'ezier Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 35
- 2020Enhanced data efficiency using deep neural networks and Gaussian processes for aerodynamic design optimizationcited by 15
- 2021Deep Generative Model for Efficient 3D Airfoil Parameterization and Generationcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.
14 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2022Physics-aware Reduced-order Modeling of Transonic Flow via β-Variational Autoencodercited by 15
- 2024Data-Driven Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Digital Twin Perspectivecited by 12
- 2022Design Space Exploration and Explanation via Conditional Variational Autoencoders in Meta-model-based Conceptual Design of Pedestrian Bridgescited by 5
- 2025Data-Efficient Deep Operator Network for Unsteady Flow: A Multi-Fidelity Approach with Physics-Guided Subsamplingcited by 5
- 2024Enhancing Graph U-Nets for Mesh-Agnostic Spatio-Temporal Flow Predictioncited by 4
- 2023Towards Reliable Uncertainty Quantification via Deep Ensembles in Multi-output Regression Taskcited by 3
- 2026How well do generative models solve inverse problems? A benchmark studycited by 2
- 2025Generative method for aerodynamic optimization based on classifier-free guided denoising diffusion probabilistic modelcited by 1
- 2026Generative Design of Ship Propellers using Conditional Flow Matchingcited by 1
- 2023Compact and Intuitive Airfoil Parameterization Method through Physics-aware Variational Autoencodercited by 0
- 2023Learning with Geometry: Including Riemannian Geometric Features in Coefficient of Pressure Prediction on Aircraft Wingscited by 0
- 2025Neural surrogates for designing gravitational wave detectorscited by 0
- 2026A nonlinear extension of parametric model embedding for dimensionality reduction in parametric shape design12 May 2026
- 2026How well do generative models solve inverse problems? A benchmark study30 Jan 2026
- 2026Generative Design of Ship Propellers using Conditional Flow Matching29 Jan 2026
- 2026Physics-Informed Uncertainty Enables Reliable AI-driven Design26 Jan 2026
- 2025Neural surrogates for designing gravitational wave detectors24 Nov 2025
- 2025Data-Efficient Deep Operator Network for Unsteady Flow: A Multi-Fidelity Approach with Physics-Guided Subsampling23 Mar 2025
- 2025Generative method for aerodynamic optimization based on classifier-free guided denoising diffusion probabilistic model10 Mar 2025
- 2024Enhancing Graph U-Nets for Mesh-Agnostic Spatio-Temporal Flow Prediction6 Jun 2024
- 2024Data-Driven Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Digital Twin Perspective5 Jan 2024
- 2023Learning with Geometry: Including Riemannian Geometric Features in Coefficient of Pressure Prediction on Aircraft Wings22 Dec 2023
- 2023Compact and Intuitive Airfoil Parameterization Method through Physics-aware Variational Autoencoder18 Nov 2023
- 2023Towards Reliable Uncertainty Quantification via Deep Ensembles in Multi-output Regression Task28 Mar 2023
- 2022Physics-aware Reduced-order Modeling of Transonic Flow via β-Variational Autoencodercited by 15
- 2024Data-Driven Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Digital Twin Perspectivecited by 12
- 2022Design Space Exploration and Explanation via Conditional Variational Autoencoders in Meta-model-based Conceptual Design of Pedestrian Bridgescited by 5
- 2025Data-Efficient Deep Operator Network for Unsteady Flow: A Multi-Fidelity Approach with Physics-Guided Subsamplingcited by 5
- 2024Enhancing Graph U-Nets for Mesh-Agnostic Spatio-Temporal Flow Predictioncited by 4
- 2023Towards Reliable Uncertainty Quantification via Deep Ensembles in Multi-output Regression Taskcited by 3
- 2026Generative Design of Ship Propellers using Conditional Flow Matchingcited by 1
- 2023Compact and Intuitive Airfoil Parameterization Method through Physics-aware Variational Autoencodercited by 0
- 2023Learning with Geometry: Including Riemannian Geometric Features in Coefficient of Pressure Prediction on Aircraft Wingscited by 0
- 2025Neural surrogates for designing gravitational wave detectorscited by 0
- 2026Physics-Informed Uncertainty Enables Reliable AI-driven Designcited by 0
- 2026A nonlinear extension of parametric model embedding for dimensionality reduction in parametric shape designcited by 0
- 2026A nonlinear extension of parametric model embedding for dimensionality reduction in parametric shape design12 May 2026
- 2026Generative Design of Ship Propellers using Conditional Flow Matching29 Jan 2026
- 2026Physics-Informed Uncertainty Enables Reliable AI-driven Design26 Jan 2026
- 2025Neural surrogates for designing gravitational wave detectors24 Nov 2025
- 2025Data-Efficient Deep Operator Network for Unsteady Flow: A Multi-Fidelity Approach with Physics-Guided Subsampling23 Mar 2025
- 2024Enhancing Graph U-Nets for Mesh-Agnostic Spatio-Temporal Flow Prediction6 Jun 2024
- 2024Data-Driven Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Digital Twin Perspective5 Jan 2024
- 2023Learning with Geometry: Including Riemannian Geometric Features in Coefficient of Pressure Prediction on Aircraft Wings22 Dec 2023
- 2023Compact and Intuitive Airfoil Parameterization Method through Physics-aware Variational Autoencoder18 Nov 2023
- 2023Towards Reliable Uncertainty Quantification via Deep Ensembles in Multi-output Regression Task28 Mar 2023
- 2022Design Space Exploration and Explanation via Conditional Variational Autoencoders in Meta-model-based Conceptual Design of Pedestrian Bridges29 Nov 2022
- 2022Physics-aware Reduced-order Modeling of Transonic Flow via β-Variational Autoencoder2 May 2022