mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Generative Model for Efficient 3D Airfoil Parameterization and Generation

arXiv 2101.02744 ↗First posted 7 Jan 2021cs.LG cs.CE cs.CGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In aerodynamic shape optimization, the convergence and computational cost are greatly affected by the representation capacity and compactness of the design space. Previous research has demonstrated that using a deep generative model to parameterize two-dimensional (2D) airfoils achieves high representation capacity/compactness, which significantly benefits shape optimization. In this paper, we propose a deep generative model, Free-Form Deformation Generative Adversarial Networks (FFD-GAN), that provides an efficient parameterization for three-dimensional (3D) aerodynamic/hydrodynamic shapes like aircraft wings, turbine blades, car bodies, and hulls. The learned model maps a compact set of design variables to 3D surface points representing the shape. We ensure the surface smoothness and continuity of generated geometries by incorporating an FFD layer into the generative model. We demonstrate FFD-GAN's performance using a wing shape design example. The results show that FFD-GAN can generate realistic designs and form a reasonable parameterization. We further demonstrate FFD-GAN's high representation compactness and capacity by testing its design space coverage, the feasibility ratio of the design space, and its performance in design optimization. We demonstrate that over 94% feasibility ratio is achieved among wings randomly generated by the FFD-GAN, while FFD and B-spline only achieve less than 31%. We also show that the FFD-GAN leads to an order of magnitude faster convergence in a wing shape optimization problem, compared to the FFD and the B-spline parameterizations.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2021.

Builds on

17 of 51 references.

References · 17

  1. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  2. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,682
  3. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
  4. 2018Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modelingcited by 1,060
  5. 2016InfoGAN: Interpretable Representation Learning by Information Maximizing Generative Adversarial Netscited by 858
  6. 2017Wasserstein GANcited by 635
  7. 20163D-R2N2: A Unified Approach for Single and Multi-view 3D Object Reconstructioncited by 587
  8. 2016Learning a Probabilistic Latent Space of Object Shapes via 3D Generative-Adversarial Modelingcited by 558
  9. 2017Octree Generating Networks: Efficient Convolutional Architectures for High-resolution 3D Outputscited by 189
  10. 2019Meta-Sim: Learning to Generate Synthetic Datasetscited by 128
  11. 2020Airfoil Design Parameterization and Optimization using B'ezier Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 35
  12. 2018Matryoshka Networks: Predicting 3D Geometry via Nested Shape Layerscited by 33
5 more
  1. 2017SurfNet: Generating 3D shape surfaces using deep residual networkscited by 32
  2. 2018Multi-chart Generative Surface Modelingcited by 26
  3. 2017DeformNet: Free-Form Deformation Network for 3D Shape Reconstruction from a Single Imagecited by 25
  4. 2020MO-PaDGAN: Reparameterizing Engineering Designs for Augmented Multi-objective Optimizationcited by 21
  5. 2018Learning Free-Form Deformations for 3D Object Reconstructioncited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

10 papers.