ABC-FL: Anomalous and Benign client Classification in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning is a distributed machine learning framework designed for data privacy preservation i.e., local data remain private throughout the entire training and testing procedure. Federated Learning is gaining popularity because it allows one to use machine learning techniques while preserving privacy. However, it inherits the vulnerabilities and susceptibilities raised in deep learning techniques. For instance, Federated Learning is particularly vulnerable to data poisoning attacks that may deteriorate its performance and integrity due to its distributed nature and inaccessibility to the raw data. In addition, it is extremely difficult to correctly identify malicious clients due to the non-Independently and/or Identically Distributed (non-IID) data. The real-world data can be complex and diverse, making them hardly distinguishable from the malicious data without direct access to the raw data. Prior research has focused on detecting malicious clients while treating only the clients having IID data as benign. In this study, we propose a method that detects and classifies anomalous clients from benign clients when benign ones have non-IID data. Our proposed method leverages feature dimension reduction, dynamic clustering, and cosine similarity-based clipping. The experimental results validates that our proposed method not only classifies the malicious clients but also alleviates their negative influences from the entire procedure. Our findings may be used in future studies to effectively eliminate anomalous clients when building a model with diverse data.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2021.
Builds on
22 of 34 references.
References · 22
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,099
- 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,036
- 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
- 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 826
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
- 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 451
- 2019Robust and Communication-Efficient Federated Learning from Non-IID Datacited by 415
- 2018Adaptive Federated Learning in Resource Constrained Edge Computing Systemscited by 408
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 330
10 more
- 2019Robust Aggregation for Federated Learningcited by 314
- 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 266
- 2019Can You Really Backdoor Federated Learning?cited by 250
- 2020Federated learning with hierarchical clustering of local updates to improve training on non-IID datacited by 222
- 2018Backdoor Embedding in Convolutional Neural Network Models via Invisible Perturbationcited by 131
- 2018A Survey on Data Collection for Machine Learning: a Big Data -- AI Integration Perspectivecited by 111
- 2020Learning to Detect Malicious Clients for Robust Federated Learningcited by 86
- 2020Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 39
- 2018Gaussian Process Subset Scanning for Anomalous Pattern Detection in Non-iid Datacited by 2
- 2021Federated Learning for Intrusion Detection in IoT Security: A Hybrid Ensemble Approachcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
2 papers.