Model architecture can transform catastrophic forgetting into positive transfer
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The work of McCloskey and Cohen popularized the concept of catastrophic interference. They used a neural network that tried to learn addition using two groups of examples as two different tasks. In their case, learning the second task rapidly deteriorated the acquired knowledge about the previous one. We hypothesize that this could be a symptom of a fundamental problem: addition is an algorithmic task that should not be learned through pattern recognition. Therefore, other model architectures better suited for this task would avoid catastrophic forgetting. We use a neural network with a different architecture that can be trained to recover the correct algorithm for the addition of binary numbers. This neural network includes conditional clauses that are naturally treated within the back-propagation algorithm. We test it in the setting proposed by McCloskey and Cohen and training on random additions one by one. The neural network not only does not suffer from catastrophic forgetting but it improves its predictive power on unseen pairs of numbers as training progresses. We also show that this is a robust effect, also present when averaging many simulations. This work emphasizes the importance that neural network architecture has for the emergence of catastrophic forgetting and introduces a neural network that is able to learn an algorithm.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2021.
Builds on
16 of 43 references.
References · 16
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
- 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,361
- 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,158
- 2013An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networkscited by 722
- 2018Learning to Learn without Forgetting by Maximizing Transfer and Minimizing Interferencecited by 521
- 2019Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learningcited by 369
- 2017Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting by Incremental Moment Matchingcited by 243
- 2020How Neural Networks Extrapolate: From Feedforward to Graph Neural Networkscited by 222
- 2020Understanding the Role of Training Regimes in Continual Learningcited by 180
- 2019What Can Neural Networks Reason About?cited by 159
- 2019A continual learning survey: Defying forgetting in classification taskscited by 118
4 more
- 2020A Theoretical Analysis of Catastrophic Forgetting through the NTK Overlap Matrixcited by 103
- 2021Continual Learning in the Teacher-Student Setup: Impact of Task Similaritycited by 88
- 2019Toward Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Learningcited by 68
- 2021Tilting the playing field: Dynamical loss functions for machine learningcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Catastrophic Forgetting in Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 1
- 2024Are Large Language Models State-of-the-art Quality Estimators for Machine Translation of User-generated Content?cited by 0
- 2024Dynamical loss functions shape landscape topography and improve learning in artificial neural networkscited by 0
- 2025Catastrophic Forgetting in Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks16 Nov 2025
- 2024Dynamical loss functions shape landscape topography and improve learning in artificial neural networks14 Oct 2024
- 2024Are Large Language Models State-of-the-art Quality Estimators for Machine Translation of User-generated Content?8 Oct 2024