Vision Transformer for femur fracture classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, the scientific community has focused on the development of CAD tools that could improve bone fractures' classification, mostly based on Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). However, the discerning accuracy of fractures' subtypes was far from optimal. This paper proposes a modified version of a very recent and powerful deep learning technique, the Vision Transformer (ViT), outperforming CNNs based approaches and consequently increasing specialists' diagnosis accuracy. 4207 manually annotated images were used and distributed, by following the AO/OTA classification, in different fracture types, the largest labeled dataset of proximal femur fractures used in literature. The ViT architecture was used and compared with a classic CNN and a multistage architecture composed of successive CNNs in cascade. To demonstrate the reliability of this approach, 1) the attention maps were used to visualize the most relevant areas of the images, 2) the performance of a generic CNN and ViT was compared through unsupervised learning techniques, and 3) 11 specialists were asked to evaluate and classify 150 proximal femur fractures' images with and without the help of the ViT, then results were compared for potential improvement. The ViT was able to correctly predict 83% of the test images. Precision, recall and F1-score were 0.77 (CI 0.64-0.90), 0.76 (CI 0.62-0.91) and 0.77 (CI 0.64-0.89), respectively. The average specialists' diagnostic improvement was 29% when supported by ViT's predictions, outperforming the algorithm alone. This paper showed the potential of Vision Transformers in bone fracture classification. For the first time, good results were obtained in sub-fractures classification, with the largest and richest dataset ever. Accordingly, the assisted diagnosis yielded the best results, proving once again the effectiveness of a coordinated work between neural networks and specialists.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2021.
Builds on
12 of 48 references.
References · 12
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
- 2018Self-Attention Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 809
- 2016EndoNet: A Deep Architecture for Recognition Tasks on Laparoscopic Videoscited by 366
- 2018Video Action Transformer Networkcited by 316
- 2019Cross-Modal Self-Attention Network for Referring Image Segmentationcited by 263
- 2021Escaping the Big Data Paradigm with Compact Transformerscited by 261
- 2018Synthetic Data Augmentation using GAN for Improved Liver Lesion Classificationcited by 136
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Advances in Medical Image Analysis with Vision Transformers: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 62
- 2022Transformers in Medical Image Analysis: A Reviewcited by 41
- 2022Transformer Meets Boundary Value Inverse Problemscited by 22
- 2022A Comprehensive Survey of Transformers for Computer Visioncited by 13
- 2025Integrating Vision and Location with Transformers: A Multimodal Deep Learning Framework for Medical Wound Analysiscited by 2
- 2025Integrating Vision and Location with Transformers: A Multimodal Deep Learning Framework for Medical Wound Analysis14 Apr 2025
- 2023Advances in Medical Image Analysis with Vision Transformers: A Comprehensive Review9 Jan 2023
- 2022A Comprehensive Survey of Transformers for Computer Vision11 Nov 2022
- 2022Transformer Meets Boundary Value Inverse Problems29 Sep 2022
- 2022Transformers in Medical Image Analysis: A Review24 Feb 2022