HyperJump: Accelerating HyperBand via Risk Modelling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the literature on hyper-parameter tuning, a number of recent solutions rely on low-fidelity observations (e.g., training with sub-sampled datasets) in order to efficiently identify promising configurations to be then tested via high-fidelity observations (e.g., using the full dataset). Among these, HyperBand is arguably one of the most popular solutions, due to its efficiency and theoretically provable robustness. In this work, we introduce HyperJump, a new approach that builds on HyperBand's robust search strategy and complements it with novel model-based risk analysis techniques that accelerate the search by skipping the evaluation of low risk configurations, i.e., configurations that are likely to be eventually discarded by HyperBand. We evaluate HyperJump on a suite of hyper-parameter optimization problems and show that it provides over one-order of magnitude speed-ups, both in sequential and parallel deployments, on a variety of deep-learning, kernel-based learning, and neural architectural search problems when compared to HyperBand and to several state-of-the-art optimizers.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2021.
Builds on
20 of 49 references.
References · 20
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 688
- 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 466
- 2020NAS-Bench-201: Extending the Scope of Reproducible Neural Architecture Searchcited by 412
- 2018Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Trainingcited by 395
- 2015Non-stochastic Best Arm Identification and Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 219
- 2018A System for Massively Parallel Hyperparameter Tuningcited by 201
- 2016Fast Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Hyperparameters on Large Datasetscited by 131
- 2020NATS-Bench: Benchmarking NAS Algorithms for Architecture Topology and Sizecited by 98
- 2014Freeze-Thaw Bayesian Optimizationcited by 86
- 2016Multi-Information Source Optimizationcited by 83
8 more
- 2018A General Framework for Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization with Gaussian Processescited by 52
- 2015Staleness-aware Async-SGD for Distributed Deep Learningcited by 43
- 2019Why Non-myopic Bayesian Optimization is Promising and How Far Should We Look-ahead? A Study via Rolloutcited by 23
- 2019Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization with Max-value Entropy Search and its parallelizationcited by 19
- 2018Combination of Hyperband and Bayesian Optimization for Hyperparameter Optimization in Deep Learningcited by 12
- 2020TrimTuner: Efficient Optimization of Machine Learning Jobs in the Cloud via Sub-Samplingcited by 12
- 2019Lynceus: Cost-efficient Tuning and Provisioning of Data Analytic Jobscited by 4
- 2014Exact Inference for Gaussian Process Regression in case of Big Data with the Cartesian Product Structurecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.