Lyapunov-based uncertainty-aware safe reinforcement learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning (RL) has shown a promising performance in learning optimal policies for a variety of sequential decision-making tasks. However, in many real-world RL problems, besides optimizing the main objectives, the agent is expected to satisfy a certain level of safety (e.g., avoiding collisions in autonomous driving). While RL problems are commonly formalized as Markov decision processes (MDPs), safety constraints are incorporated via constrained Markov decision processes (CMDPs). Although recent advances in safe RL have enabled learning safe policies in CMDPs, these safety requirements should be satisfied during both training and in the deployment process. Furthermore, it is shown that in memory-based and partially observable environments, these methods fail to maintain safety over unseen out-of-distribution observations. To address these limitations, we propose a Lyapunov-based uncertainty-aware safe RL model. The introduced model adopts a Lyapunov function that converts trajectory-based constraints to a set of local linear constraints. Furthermore, to ensure the safety of the agent in highly uncertain environments, an uncertainty quantification method is developed that enables identifying risk-averse actions through estimating the probability of constraint violations. Moreover, a Transformers model is integrated to provide the agent with memory to process long time horizons of information via the self-attention mechanism. The proposed model is evaluated in grid-world navigation tasks where safety is defined as avoiding static and dynamic obstacles in fully and partially observable environments. The results of these experiments show a significant improvement in the performance of the agent both in achieving optimality and satisfying safety constraints.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2021.
Builds on
24 of 42 references.
References · 24
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
- 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
- 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
- 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
- 2018QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 730
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
12 more
- 2020Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methodscited by 302
- 2018A Lyapunov-based Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 278
- 2020Emergent Complexity and Zero-shot Transfer via Unsupervised Environment Designcited by 260
- 2016CAD2RL: Real Single-Image Flight without a Single Real Imagecited by 227
- 2019Adaptive Attention Span in Transformerscited by 148
- 2019Lyapunov-based Safe Policy Optimization for Continuous Controlcited by 140
- 2019Augmenting Self-attention with Persistent Memorycited by 92
- 2017Uncertainty-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Collision Avoidancecited by 86
- 2018Safe Reinforcement Learning with Model Uncertainty Estimatescited by 70
- 2019Making Efficient Use of Demonstrations to Solve Hard Exploration Problemscited by 45
- 2016Safe Learning of Regions of Attraction for Uncertain, Nonlinear Systems with Gaussian Processescited by 38
- 2020Adaptive Transformers in RLcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.