mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The CORSMAL benchmark for the prediction of the properties of containers

arXiv 2107.12719 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2021cs.MM cs.CV cs.SDcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The contactless estimation of the weight of a container and the amount of its content manipulated by a person are key pre-requisites for safe human-to-robot handovers. However, opaqueness and transparencies of the container and the content, and variability of materials, shapes, and sizes, make this estimation difficult. In this paper, we present a range of methods and an open framework to benchmark acoustic and visual perception for the estimation of the capacity of a container, and the type, mass, and amount of its content. The framework includes a dataset, specific tasks and performance measures. We conduct an in-depth comparative analysis of methods that used this framework and audio-only or vision-only baselines designed from related works. Based on this analysis, we can conclude that audio-only and audio-visual classifiers are suitable for the estimation of the type and amount of the content using different types of convolutional neural networks, combined with either recurrent neural networks or a majority voting strategy, whereas computer vision methods are suitable to determine the capacity of the container using regression and geometric approaches. Classifying the content type and level using only audio achieves a weighted average F1-score up to 81% and 97%, respectively. Estimating the container capacity with vision-only approaches and estimating the filling mass with audio-visual multi-stage approaches reach up to 65% weighted average capacity and mass scores. These results show that there is still room for improvement on the design of new methods. These new methods can be ranked and compared on the individual leaderboards provided by our open framework.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2021.

Builds on

31 of 61 references.

References · 31

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  5. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  6. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
  7. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
  8. 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,624
  9. 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,139
  10. 2016CNN Architectures for Large-Scale Audio Classificationcited by 701
  11. 2019Normalized Object Coordinate Space for Category-Level 6D Object Pose and Size Estimationcited by 490
  12. 2018BOP: Benchmark for 6D Object Pose Estimationcited by 254
19 more
  1. 2020Objectron: A Large Scale Dataset of Object-Centric Videos in the Wild with Pose Annotationscited by 155
  2. 2019ClearGrasp: 3D Shape Estimation of Transparent Objects for Manipulationcited by 124
  3. 2020Learning Canonical Shape Space for Category-Level 6D Object Pose and Size Estimationcited by 123
  4. 2019HomebrewedDB: RGB-D Dataset for 6D Pose Estimation of 3D Objectscited by 110
  5. 2020Category Level Object Pose Estimation via Neural Analysis-by-Synthesiscited by 100
  6. 2019KeyPose: Multi-View 3D Labeling and Keypoint Estimation for Transparent Objectscited by 75
  7. 2020Object Handovers: a Review for Roboticscited by 28
  8. 2020Reactive Human-to-Robot Handovers of Arbitrary Objectscited by 25
  9. 2019In Perfect Shape: Certifiably Optimal 3D Shape Reconstruction from 2D Landmarkscited by 17
  10. 2020Object-Independent Human-to-Robot Handovers using Real Time Robotic Visioncited by 17
  11. 2017See the Glass Half Full: Reasoning about Liquid Containers, their Volume and Contentcited by 11
  12. 2019Making Sense of Audio Vibration for Liquid Height Estimation in Robotic Pouringcited by 11
  13. 2018Accurate Pouring with an Autonomous Robot Using an RGB-D Cameracited by 8
  14. 2017Reasoning About Liquids via Closed-Loop Simulationcited by 7
  15. 2019Multi-view shape estimation of transparent containerscited by 7
  16. 2020Robust Robotic Pouring using Audition and Hapticscited by 6
  17. 2021Improving filling level classification with adversarial trainingcited by 5
  18. 2020Top-1 CORSMAL Challenge 2020 Submission: Filling Mass Estimation Using Multi-modal Observations of Human-robot Handoverscited by 4
  19. 2021Audio classification of the content of food containers and drinking glassescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

6 papers.