mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mitigating Performance Saturation in Neural Marked Point Processes: Architectures and Loss Functions

arXiv 2107.03354 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2021cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Attributed event sequences are commonly encountered in practice. A recent research line focuses on incorporating neural networks with the statistical model -- marked point processes, which is the conventional tool for dealing with attributed event sequences. Neural marked point processes possess good interpretability of probabilistic models as well as the representational power of neural networks. However, we find that performance of neural marked point processes is not always increasing as the network architecture becomes more complicated and larger, which is what we call the performance saturation phenomenon. This is due to the fact that the generalization error of neural marked point processes is determined by both the network representational ability and the model specification at the same time. Therefore we can draw two major conclusions: first, simple network structures can perform no worse than complicated ones for some cases; second, using a proper probabilistic assumption is as equally, if not more, important as improving the complexity of the network. Based on this observation, we propose a simple graph-based network structure called GCHP, which utilizes only graph convolutional layers, thus it can be easily accelerated by the parallel mechanism. We directly consider the distribution of interarrival times instead of imposing a specific assumption on the conditional intensity function, and propose to use a likelihood ratio loss with a moment matching mechanism for optimization and model selection. Experimental results show that GCHP can significantly reduce training time and the likelihood ratio loss with interarrival time probability assumptions can greatly improve the model performance.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2021.

Builds on

15 of 39 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
  3. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
  4. 2020Transformer Hawkes Processcited by 230
  5. 2019Fully Neural Network based Model for General Temporal Point Processescited by 119
  6. 2017Modeling The Intensity Function Of Point Process Via Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 93
  7. 2017Geometric Matrix Completion with Recurrent Multi-Graph Neural Networkscited by 88
  8. 2016Learning Granger Causality for Hawkes Processescited by 68
  9. 2017A Review of Self-Exciting Spatio-Temporal Point Processes and Their Applicationscited by 40
  10. 2016Uncovering Causality from Multivariate Hawkes Integrated Cumulantscited by 38
  11. 2014Discovering Latent Network Structure in Point Process Datacited by 28
  12. 2017Fake News Mitigation via Point Process Based Interventioncited by 24
3 more
  1. 2019Self-Attentive Hawkes Processescited by 23
  2. 2017A Dirichlet Mixture Model of Hawkes Processes for Event Sequence Clusteringcited by 16
  3. 2018Superposition-Assisted Stochastic Optimization for Hawkes Processescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 6; 2025: 1.

12 papers.