mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dueling Bandits with Team Comparisons

arXiv 2107.02738 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2021cs.LG cs.DS stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce the dueling teams problem, a new online-learning setting in which the learner observes noisy comparisons of disjoint pairs of k-sized teams from a universe of n players. The goal of the learner is to minimize the number of duels required to identify, with high probability, a Condorcet winning team, i.e., a team which wins against any other disjoint team (with probability at least 1/2). Noisy comparisons are linked to a total order on the teams. We formalize our model by building upon the dueling bandits setting (Yue et al.2012) and provide several algorithms, both for stochastic and deterministic settings. For the stochastic setting, we provide a reduction to the classical dueling bandits setting, yielding an algorithm that identifies a Condorcet winning team within O((n + k log (k)) fracmax(loglog n, log k)Delta2) duels, where Delta is a gap parameter. For deterministic feedback, we additionally present a gap-independent algorithm that identifies a Condorcet winning team within O(nklog(k)+k5) duels.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2021.

Builds on

10 of 27 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
  2. 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 280
  3. 2018Preference-based Online Learning with Dueling Bandits: A Surveycited by 100
  4. 2017Multi-dueling Bandits with Dependent Armscited by 35
  5. 2016Towards Instance Optimal Bounds for Best Arm Identificationcited by 30
  6. 2019Top-k Combinatorial Bandits with Full-Bandit Feedbackcited by 28
  7. 2018PAC Ranking from Pairwise and Listwise Queries: Lower Bounds and Upper Boundscited by 17
  8. 2016Multi-Dueling Bandits and Their Application to Online Ranker Evaluationcited by 16
  9. 2020The Sample Complexity of Best-k Items Selection from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 9
  10. 2016Learning Combinatorial Functions from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.