mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DTGAN: Differential Private Training for Tabular GANs

arXiv 2107.02521 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2021cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tabular generative adversarial networks (TGAN) have recently emerged to cater to the need of synthesizing tabular data -- the most widely used data format. While synthetic tabular data offers the advantage of complying with privacy regulations, there still exists a risk of privacy leakage via inference attacks due to interpolating the properties of real data during training. Differential private (DP) training algorithms provide theoretical guarantees for training machine learning models by injecting statistical noise to prevent privacy leaks. However, the challenges of applying DP on TGAN are to determine the most optimal framework (i.e., PATE/DP-SGD) and neural network (i.e., Generator/Discriminator)to inject noise such that the data utility is well maintained under a given privacy guarantee. In this paper, we propose DTGAN, a novel conditional Wasserstein tabular GAN that comes in two variants DTGAN_G and DTGAN_D, for providing a detailed comparison of tabular GANs trained using DP-SGD for the generator vs discriminator, respectively. We elicit the privacy analysis associated with training the generator with complex loss functions (i.e., classification and information losses) needed for high quality tabular data synthesis. Additionally, we rigorously evaluate the theoretical privacy guarantees offered by DP empirically against membership and attribute inference attacks. Our results on 3 datasets show that the DP-SGD framework is superior to PATE and that a DP discriminator is more optimal for training convergence. Thus, we find (i) DTGAN_D is capable of maintaining the highest data utility across 4 ML models by up to 18% in terms of the average precision score for a strict privacy budget, epsilon = 1, as compared to the prior studies and (ii) DP effectively prevents privacy loss against inference attacks by restricting the success probability of membership attacks to be close to 50%.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2021.

Builds on

14 of 26 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  3. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
  4. 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 695
  5. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
  6. 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 347
  7. 2018Differentially Private Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 235
  8. 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 234
  9. 2018Data Synthesis based on Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 184
  10. 2015On Wasserstein Two Sample Testing and Related Families of Nonparametric Testscited by 165
  11. 2021CTAB-GAN: Effective Table Data Synthesizingcited by 156
  12. 2020DP-CGAN: Differentially Private Synthetic Data and Label Generationcited by 118
2 more
  1. 2020GS-WGAN: A Gradient-Sanitized Approach for Learning Differentially Private Generatorscited by 117
  2. 2020Differentially Private Synthetic Medical Data Generation using Convolutional GANscited by 52

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

7 papers.