mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding the Security of Deepfake Detection

arXiv 2107.02045 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2021cs.CR cs.CV cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deepfakes pose growing challenges to the trust of information on the Internet. Thus, detecting deepfakes has attracted increasing attentions from both academia and industry. State-of-the-art deepfake detection methods consist of two key components, i.e., face extractor and face classifier, which extract the face region in an image and classify it to be real/fake, respectively. Existing studies mainly focused on improving the detection performance in non-adversarial settings, leaving security of deepfake detection in adversarial settings largely unexplored. In this work, we aim to bridge the gap. In particular, we perform a systematic measurement study to understand the security of the state-of-the-art deepfake detection methods in adversarial settings. We use two large-scale public deepfakes data sources including FaceForensics++ and Facebook Deepfake Detection Challenge, where the deepfakes are fake face images; and we train state-of-the-art deepfake detection methods. These detection methods can achieve 0.94--0.99 accuracies in non-adversarial settings on these datasets. However, our measurement results uncover multiple security limitations of the deepfake detection methods in adversarial settings. First, we find that an attacker can evade a face extractor, i.e., the face extractor fails to extract the correct face regions, via adding small Gaussian noise to its deepfake images. Second, we find that a face classifier trained using deepfakes generated by one method cannot detect deepfakes generated by another method, i.e., an attacker can evade detection via generating deepfakes using a new method. Third, we find that an attacker can leverage backdoor attacks developed by the adversarial machine learning community to evade a face classifier. Our results highlight that deepfake detection should consider the adversarial nature of the problem.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2021.

Builds on

37 of 58 references.

References · 37

  1. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  2. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
  5. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  6. 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
  7. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
  8. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  9. 2019Semantic Image Synthesis with Spatially-Adaptive Normalizationcited by 1,295
  10. 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,095
  11. 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,052
  12. 2017StarGAN: Unified Generative Adversarial Networks for Multi-Domain Image-to-Image Translationcited by 1,036
25 more
  1. 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 842
  2. 2020Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videoscited by 631
  3. 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 501
  4. 2019STRIP: A Defence Against Trojan Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 437
  5. 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
  6. 2019FSGAN: Subject Agnostic Face Swapping and Reenactmentcited by 319
  7. 2018Exposing DeepFake Videos By Detecting Face Warping Artifactscited by 318
  8. 2018Exposing Deep Fakes Using Inconsistent Head Posescited by 294
  9. 2019Few-Shot Adversarial Learning of Realistic Neural Talking Head Modelscited by 284
  10. 2019Deferred Neural Rendering: Image Synthesis using Neural Texturescited by 253
  11. 2019Multi-task Learning For Detecting and Segmenting Manipulated Facial Images and Videoscited by 130
  12. 2018Two-Stream Neural Networks for Tampered Face Detectioncited by 125
  13. 2020The DeepFake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Datasetcited by 125
  14. 2020Intrinsic Certified Robustness of Bagging against Data Poisoning Attackscited by 90
  15. 2020Evading Deepfake-Image Detectors with White- and Black-Box Attackscited by 80
  16. 2020On Certifying Robustness against Backdoor Attacks via Randomized Smoothingcited by 74
  17. 2020Adversarial Deepfakes: Evaluating Vulnerability of Deepfake Detectors to Adversarial Examplescited by 66
  18. 2019Use of a Capsule Network to Detect Fake Images and Videoscited by 63
  19. 2017Recasting Residual-based Local Descriptors as Convolutional Neural Networks: an Application to Image Forgery Detectioncited by 56
  20. 2017Mitigating Evasion Attacks to Deep Neural Networks via Region-based Classificationcited by 56
  21. 2018In Ictu Oculi: Exposing AI Generated Fake Face Videos by Detecting Eye Blinkingcited by 54
  22. 2019Certified Robustness for Top-k Predictions against Adversarial Perturbations via Randomized Smoothingcited by 54
  23. 2020Adversarial Perturbations Fool Deepfake Detectorscited by 48
  24. 2018Graph-based Security and Privacy Analytics via Collective Classification with Joint Weight Learning and Propagationcited by 14
  25. 2013SybilBelief: A Semi-supervised Learning Approach for Structure-based Sybil Detectioncited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.

6 papers.