mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Textual Data Distributions: Kullback Leibler Textual Distributions Contrasts on GPT-2 Generated Texts, with Supervised, Unsupervised Learning on Vaccine & Market Topics & Sentiment

arXiv 2107.02025 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2021cs.CL cs.LG cs.SIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Efficient textual data distributions (TDD) alignment and generation are open research problems in textual analytics and NLP. It is presently difficult to parsimoniously and methodologically confirm that two or more natural language datasets belong to similar distributions, and to identify the extent to which textual data possess alignment. This study focuses on addressing a segment of the broader problem described above by applying multiple supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML) methods to explore the behavior of TDD by (i) topical alignment, and (ii) by sentiment alignment. Furthermore we use multiple text generation methods including fine-tuned GPT-2, to generate text by topic and by sentiment. Finally we develop a unique process driven variation of Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) application to TDD, named KL Textual Distributions Contrasts(KL-TDC) to identify the alignment of machine generated textual corpora with naturally occurring textual corpora. This study thus identifies a unique approach for generating and validating TDD by topic and sentiment, which can be used to help address sparse data problems and other research, practice and classroom situations in need of artificially generated topic or sentiment aligned textual data.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2021.

Builds on

17 of 54 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 807
  3. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
  4. 2020Pre-trained Models for Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 505
  5. 2019Augmenting Data with Mixup for Sentence Classification: An Empirical Studycited by 125
  6. 2020Logical Natural Language Generation from Open-Domain Tablescited by 90
  7. 2018Sequence-to-Sequence Data Augmentation for Dialogue Language Understandingcited by 68
  8. 2017Adversarial Feature Matching for Text Generationcited by 58
  9. 2020Natural Language Processing Advancements By Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 50
  10. 2020Comparing BERT against traditional machine learning text classificationcited by 46
  11. 2018Text Data Augmentation Made Simple By Leveraging NLP Cloud APIscited by 40
  12. 2018An Introductory Survey on Attention Mechanisms in NLP Problemscited by 32
5 more
  1. 2021Exploring Transformers in Natural Language Generation: GPT, BERT, and XLNetcited by 27
  2. 2020COVID-19 Public Sentiment Insights and Machine Learning for Tweets Classificationcited by 11
  3. 2021Unsupervised Contextual Paraphrase Generation using Lexical Control and Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
  4. 2020An Overview of Natural Language State Representation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
  5. 2021Strategies for Democratization of Supercomputing: Availability, Accessibility and Usability of High Performance Computing for Education and Practice of Big Data Analyticscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

2 papers.