mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fast Rate Learning in Stochastic First Price Bidding

arXiv 2107.01835 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

First-price auctions have largely replaced traditional bidding approaches based on Vickrey auctions in programmatic advertising. As far as learning is concerned, first-price auctions are more challenging because the optimal bidding strategy does not only depend on the value of the item but also requires some knowledge of the other bids. They have already given rise to several works in sequential learning, many of which consider models for which the value of the buyer or the opponents' maximal bid is chosen in an adversarial manner. Even in the simplest settings, this gives rise to algorithms whose regret grows as √T with respect to the time horizon T. Focusing on the case where the buyer plays against a stationary stochastic environment, we show how to achieve significantly lower regret: when the opponents' maximal bid distribution is known we provide an algorithm whose regret can be as low as log2(T); in the case where the distribution must be learnt sequentially, a generalization of this algorithm can achieve T1/3+ ε regret, for any ε>0. To obtain these results, we introduce two novel ideas that can be of interest in their own right. First, by transposing results obtained in the posted price setting, we provide conditions under which the first-price biding utility is locally quadratic around its optimum. Second, we leverage the observation that, on small sub-intervals, the concentration of the variations of the empirical distribution function may be controlled more accurately than by using the classical Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz inequality. Numerical simulations confirm that our algorithms converge much faster than alternatives proposed in the literature for various bid distributions, including for bids collected on an actual programmatic advertising platform.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2021.

Builds on

12 of 32 references.

References · 12

  1. 2016Explore First, Exploit Next: The True Shape of Regret in Bandit Problemscited by 78
  2. 2015The Sample Complexity of Revenue Maximizationcited by 48
  3. 2015Online learning in repeated auctionscited by 39
  4. 2014Unimodal Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 36
  5. 2017Learning to Bid Without Knowing your Valuecited by 34
  6. 2020Optimal No-regret Learning in Repeated First-price Auctionscited by 33
  7. 2018Dynamic Pricing with Finitely Many Unknown Valuationscited by 23
  8. 2014Making the Most of Your Samplescited by 15
  9. 2020Learning in repeated auctionscited by 15
  10. 2020Convergence Analysis of No-Regret Bidding Algorithms in Repeated Auctionscited by 14
  11. 2015Ironing in the Darkcited by 13
  12. 2020Efficient Algorithms for Stochastic Repeated Second-price Auctionscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.