mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Policy Transfer across Visual and Dynamics Domain Gaps via Iterative Grounding

arXiv 2107.00339 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2021cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The ability to transfer a policy from one environment to another is a promising avenue for efficient robot learning in realistic settings where task supervision is not available. This can allow us to take advantage of environments well suited for training, such as simulators or laboratories, to learn a policy for a real robot in a home or office. To succeed, such policy transfer must overcome both the visual domain gap (e.g. different illumination or background) and the dynamics domain gap (e.g. different robot calibration or modelling error) between source and target environments. However, prior policy transfer approaches either cannot handle a large domain gap or can only address one type of domain gap at a time. In this paper, we propose a novel policy transfer method with iterative "environment grounding", IDAPT, that alternates between (1) directly minimizing both visual and dynamics domain gaps by grounding the source environment in the target environment domains, and (2) training a policy on the grounded source environment. This iterative training progressively aligns the domains between the two environments and adapts the policy to the target environment. Once trained, the policy can be directly executed on the target environment. The empirical results on locomotion and robotic manipulation tasks demonstrate that our approach can effectively transfer a policy across visual and dynamics domain gaps with minimal supervision and interaction with the target environment. Videos and code are available at https://clvrai.com/idapt .

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2021.

Builds on

29 of 35 references.

References · 29

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  4. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  5. 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,401
  6. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
  7. 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
  8. 2017Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networkscited by 707
  9. 2017Learning Complex Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrationscited by 685
  10. 2017Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomizationcited by 616
  11. 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
  12. 2018Multi-Goal Reinforcement Learning: Challenging Robotics Environments and Request for Researchcited by 256
17 more
  1. 2020Learning Agile Robotic Locomotion Skills by Imitating Animalscited by 229
  2. 2017Asymmetric Actor Critic for Image-Based Robot Learningcited by 202
  3. 2018Generative Adversarial Imitation from Observationcited by 183
  4. 2018Sim-to-Real via Sim-to-Sim: Data-efficient Robotic Grasping via Randomized-to-Canonical Adaptation Networkscited by 171
  5. 2017Using Simulation and Domain Adaptation to Improve Efficiency of Deep Robotic Graspingcited by 138
  6. 2016EPOpt: Learning Robust Neural Network Policies Using Model Ensemblescited by 136
  7. 2016Sim-to-Real Robot Learning from Pixels with Progressive Netscited by 89
  8. 2020RL-CycleGAN: Reinforcement Learning Aware Simulation-To-Realcited by 89
  9. 2017Learning Invariant Feature Spaces to Transfer Skills with Reinforcement Learningcited by 84
  10. 2019IKEA Furniture Assembly Environment for Long-Horizon Complex Manipulation Taskscited by 68
  11. 2017Transferring End-to-End Visuomotor Control from Simulation to Real World for a Multi-Stage Taskcited by 66
  12. 2020Learning Cross-Domain Correspondence for Control with Dynamics Cycle-Consistencycited by 43
  13. 2020Never Stop Learning: The Effectiveness of Fine-Tuning in Robotic Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
  14. 2019Self-Supervised Sim-to-Real Adaptation for Visual Robotic Manipulationcited by 19
  15. 2020Reinforced Grounded Action Transformation for Sim-to-Real Transfercited by 17
  16. 2016Cross-Modal Scene Networkscited by 16
  17. 2015A Framework for Fine Robotic Assemblycited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

12 papers.