INN: A Method Identifying Clean-annotated Samples via Consistency Effect in Deep Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In many classification problems, collecting massive clean-annotated data is not easy, and thus a lot of researches have been done to handle data with noisy labels. Most recent state-of-art solutions for noisy label problems are built on the small-loss strategy which exploits the memorization effect. While it is a powerful tool, the memorization effect has several drawbacks. The performances are sensitive to the choice of a training epoch required for utilizing the memorization effect. In addition, when the labels are heavily contaminated or imbalanced, the memorization effect may not occur in which case the methods based on the small-loss strategy fail to identify clean labeled data. We introduce a new method called INN(Integration with the Nearest Neighborhoods) to refine clean labeled data from training data with noisy labels. The proposed method is based on a new discovery that a prediction pattern at neighbor regions of clean labeled data is consistently different from that of noisy labeled data regardless of training epochs. The INN method requires more computation but is much stable and powerful than the small-loss strategy. By carrying out various experiments, we demonstrate that the INN method resolves the shortcomings in the memorization effect successfully and thus is helpful to construct more accurate deep prediction models with training data with noisy labels.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2021.
Builds on
30 of 46 references.
References · 30
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 675
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
18 more
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2020Classification-Based Anomaly Detection for General Datacited by 211
- 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
- 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
- 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
- 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
- 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 88
- 2019Combating Label Noise in Deep Learning Using Abstentioncited by 86
- 2020Deep k-NN for Noisy Labelscited by 55
- 2015The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Noisy Data for Fine-Grained Recognitioncited by 48
Built on by
Not cited yet.