Exploring the Representational Power of Graph Autoencoder
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While representation learning has yielded a great success on many graph learning tasks, there is little understanding behind the structures that are being captured by these embeddings. For example, we wonder if the topological features, such as the Triangle Count, the Degree of the node and other centrality measures are concretely encoded in the embeddings. Furthermore, we ask if the presence of these structures in the embeddings is necessary for a better performance on the downstream tasks, such as clustering and classification. To address these questions, we conduct an extensive empirical study over three classes of unsupervised graph embedding models and seven different variants of Graph Autoencoders. Our results show that five topological features: the Degree, the Local Clustering Score, the Betweenness Centrality, the Eigenvector Centrality, and Triangle Count are concretely preserved in the first layer of the graph autoencoder that employs the SUM aggregation rule, under the condition that the model preserves the second-order proximity. We supplement further evidence for the presence of these features by revealing a hierarchy in the distribution of the topological features in the embeddings of the aforementioned model. We also show that a model with such properties can outperform other models on certain downstream tasks, especially when the preserved features are relevant to the task at hand. Finally, we evaluate the suitability of our findings through a test case study related to social influence prediction.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2021.
Builds on
22 of 32 references.
References · 22
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,918
- 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,694
- 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,547
- 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,382
- 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,198
- 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,102
- 2017Representation Learning on Graphs: Methods and Applicationscited by 457
10 more
- 2017A Comprehensive Survey of Graph Embedding: Problems, Techniques and Applicationscited by 260
- 2019Deep Graph Library: A Graph-Centric, Highly-Performant Package for Graph Neural Networkscited by 242
- 2017Graph Embedding Techniques, Applications, and Performance: A Surveycited by 188
- 2019Attributed Graph Clustering: A Deep Attentional Embedding Approachcited by 149
- 2018DeepInf: Social Influence Prediction with Deep Learningcited by 128
- 2019Efficient Parameter-free Clustering Using First Neighbor Relationscited by 97
- 2019DEMO-Net: Degree-specific Graph Neural Networks for Node and Graph Classificationcited by 59
- 2019Semi-Implicit Graph Variational Auto-Encoderscited by 54
- 2018Multi-dimensional Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 15
- 2018Exploring the Semantic Content of Unsupervised Graph Embeddings: An Empirical Studycited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.
1 paper.