mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Federated Learning Framework with Straggling Mitigation and Privacy-Awareness for AI-based Mobile Application Services

arXiv 2106.09261 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2021cs.NI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we propose a novel framework to address straggling and privacy issues for federated learning (FL)-based mobile application services, taking into account limited computing/communications resources at mobile users (MUs)/mobile application provider (MAP), privacy cost, the rationality and incentive competition among MUs in contributing data to the MAP. Particularly, the MAP first determines a set of the best MUs for the FL process based on the MUs' provided information/features. To mitigate straggling problems with privacy-awareness, each selected MU can then encrypt part of local data and upload the encrypted data to the MAP for an encrypted training process, in addition to the local training process. For that, each selected MU can propose a contract to the MAP according to its expected trainable local data and privacy-protected encrypted data. To find the optimal contracts that can maximize utilities of the MAP and all the participating MUs while maintaining high learning quality of the whole system, we first develop a multi-principal one-agent contract-based problem leveraging FL-based multiple utility functions. These utility functions account for the MUs' privacy cost, the MAP's limited computing resources, and asymmetric information between the MAP and MUs. Then, we transform the problem into an equivalent low-complexity problem and develop a light-weight iterative algorithm to effectively find the optimal solutions. Experiments with a real-world dataset show that our framework can speed up training time up to 49% and improve prediction accuracy up to 4.6 times while enhancing the network's social welfare, i.e., total utility of all participating entities, up to 114% under the privacy cost consideration compared with those of baseline methods.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2021.

Builds on

16 of 50 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 407
  3. 2019Asynchronous Federated Optimizationcited by 264
  4. 2021The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure Aggregationcited by 127
  5. 2018Deep Learning in Mobile and Wireless Networking: A Surveycited by 117
  6. 2019Reliable Federated Learning for Mobile Networkscited by 92
  7. 2018In-Edge AI: Intelligentizing Mobile Edge Computing, Caching and Communication by Federated Learningcited by 80
  8. 2019Federated Learning for Edge Networks: Resource Optimization and Incentive Mechanismcited by 75
  9. 2020Convergence of Update Aware Device Scheduling for Federated Learning at the Wireless Edgecited by 71
  10. 2020Scheduling for Cellular Federated Edge Learning with Importance and Channel Awarenesscited by 62
  11. 2020Federated Learning for 6G Communications: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 32
  12. 2020Coded Computing for Low-Latency Federated Learning over Wireless Edge Networkscited by 32
4 more
  1. 2018Application of Machine Learning in Wireless Networks: Key Techniques and Open Issuescited by 29
  2. 2018Joint Service Pricing and Cooperative Relay Communication for Federated Learningcited by 22
  3. 2020Incentive Mechanism Design for Distributed Coded Machine Learningcited by 4
  4. 2018Reducing Metadata Leakage from Encrypted Files and Communication with PURBscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.