Amortized Auto-Tuning: Cost-Efficient Bayesian Transfer Optimization for Hyperparameter Recommendation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the surge in the number of hyperparameters and training times of modern machine learning models, hyperparameter tuning is becoming increasingly expensive. However, after assessing 40 tuning methods systematically, we find that each faces certain limitations. In particular, methods that speed up tuning via knowledge transfer typically require the final performance of hyperparameters and do not focus on low-fidelity information. As we demonstrate empirically, this common practice is suboptimal and can incur an unnecessary use of resources. It is more cost-efficient to instead leverage low-fidelity tuning observations to measure inter-task similarity and transfer knowledge from existing to new tasks accordingly. However, performing multi-fidelity tuning comes with its own challenges in the transfer setting: the noise in additional observations and the need for performance forecasting. Therefore, we propose and conduct a thorough analysis of a multi-task multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization framework, which leads to the best instantiation--amortized auto-tuning (AT2). We further present an offline-computed 27-task hyperparameter recommendation (HyperRec) database to serve the community. Extensive experiments on HyperRec and other real-world databases illustrate the effectiveness of our AT2 method.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2021.
Builds on
37 of 94 references.
References · 37
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 791
- 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 688
- 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
- 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 603
- 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 536
- 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 466
- 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
- 2019AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 388
25 more
- 2015Scalable Bayesian Optimization Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 284
- 2014Scalable Variational Gaussian Process Classificationcited by 226
- 2019Task2Vec: Task Embedding for Meta-Learningcited by 197
- 2018Large Scale Fine-Grained Categorization and Domain-Specific Transfer Learningcited by 174
- 2016Fast Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Hyperparameters on Large Datasetscited by 131
- 2017Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimisation with Continuous Approximationscited by 120
- 2019Practical Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization for Hyperparameter Tuningcited by 91
- 2014Freeze-Thaw Bayesian Optimizationcited by 86
- 2019An Open Source AutoML Benchmarkcited by 85
- 2021Few-Shot Bayesian Optimization with Deep Kernel Surrogatescited by 70
- 2020Auto-PyTorch Tabular: Multi-Fidelity MetaLearning for Efficient and Robust AutoDLcited by 67
- 2019Tuning Hyperparameters without Grad Students: Scalable and Robust Bayesian Optimisation with Dragonflycited by 66
- 2019Learning search spaces for Bayesian optimization: Another view of hyperparameter transfer learningcited by 50
- 2020Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization via Deep Neural Networkscited by 46
- 2017Probabilistic Matrix Factorization for Automated Machine Learningcited by 31
- 2018OBOE: Collaborative Filtering for AutoML Model Selectioncited by 31
- 2016Warm Starting Bayesian Optimizationcited by 21
- 2019Bayesian Optimization for Policy Search via Online-Offline Experimentationcited by 20
- 2019Bayesian Optimization for Iterative Learningcited by 19
- 2020MFES-HB: Efficient Hyperband with Multi-Fidelity Quality Measurementscited by 18
- 2018Hyperparameter Learning via Distributional Transfercited by 13
- 2020HyperSTAR: Task-Aware Hyperparameters for Deep Networkscited by 9
- 2020Additive Tree-Structured Covariance Function for Conditional Parameter Spaces in Bayesian Optimizationcited by 6
- 2019Transferable Neural Processes for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 3
- 2021Hyperparameter Optimization with Differentiable Metafeaturescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3.
4 papers.
- 2021HPOBench: A Collection of Reproducible Multi-Fidelity Benchmark Problems for HPOcited by 111
- 2022Tutorial on amortized optimizationcited by 83
- 2022Generalizing Bayesian Optimization with Decision-theoretic Entropiescited by 11
- 2022Privacy-preserving Online AutoML for Domain-Specific Face Detectioncited by 4
- 2022Generalizing Bayesian Optimization with Decision-theoretic Entropies4 Oct 2022
- 2022Privacy-preserving Online AutoML for Domain-Specific Face Detection16 Mar 2022
- 2022Tutorial on amortized optimization1 Feb 2022
- 2021HPOBench: A Collection of Reproducible Multi-Fidelity Benchmark Problems for HPO14 Sep 2021