mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Ctrl-P: Temporal Control of Prosodic Variation for Speech Synthesis

arXiv 2106.08352 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2021eess.AS cs.LG cs.SDcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text does not fully specify the spoken form, so text-to-speech models must be able to learn from speech data that vary in ways not explained by the corresponding text. One way to reduce the amount of unexplained variation in training data is to provide acoustic information as an additional learning signal. When generating speech, modifying this acoustic information enables multiple distinct renditions of a text to be produced. Since much of the unexplained variation is in the prosody, we propose a model that generates speech explicitly conditioned on the three primary acoustic correlates of prosody: F0, energy and duration. The model is flexible about how the values of these features are specified: they can be externally provided, or predicted from text, or predicted then subsequently modified. Compared to a model that employs a variational auto-encoder to learn unsupervised latent features, our model provides more interpretable, temporally-precise, and disentangled control. When automatically predicting the acoustic features from text, it generates speech that is more natural than that from a Tacotron 2 model with reference encoder. Subsequent human-in-the-loop modification of the predicted acoustic features can significantly further increase naturalness.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2021.

Builds on

19 of 30 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
  2. 2017Natural TTS Synthesis by Conditioning WaveNet on Mel Spectrogram Predictionscited by 804
  3. 2020FastSpeech 2: Fast and High-Quality End-to-End Text to Speechcited by 717
  4. 2018Style Tokens: Unsupervised Style Modeling, Control and Transfer in End-to-End Speech Synthesiscited by 259
  5. 2018Efficient Neural Audio Synthesiscited by 219
  6. 2018Towards End-to-End Prosody Transfer for Expressive Speech Synthesis with Tacotroncited by 173
  7. 2020FastPitch: Parallel Text-to-speech with Pitch Predictioncited by 151
  8. 2018Hierarchical Generative Modeling for Controllable Speech Synthesiscited by 93
  9. 2017Deep Voice 3: Scaling Text-to-Speech with Convolutional Sequence Learningcited by 67
  10. 2019Learning to Speak Fluently in a Foreign Language: Multilingual Speech Synthesis and Cross-Language Voice Cloningcited by 66
  11. 2018Robust and fine-grained prosody control of end-to-end speech synthesiscited by 48
  12. 2020Fully-hierarchical fine-grained prosody modeling for interpretable speech synthesiscited by 41
7 more
  1. 2019Fine-grained robust prosody transfer for single-speaker neural text-to-speechcited by 27
  2. 2019CHiVE: Varying Prosody in Speech Synthesis with a Linguistically Driven Dynamic Hierarchical Conditional Variational Networkcited by 25
  3. 2020Controllable neural text-to-speech synthesis using intuitive prosodic featurescited by 19
  4. 2018Deep Encoder-Decoder Models for Unsupervised Learning of Controllable Speech Synthesiscited by 13
  5. 2020Controllable Neural Prosody Synthesiscited by 10
  6. 2019Using generative modelling to produce varied intonation for speech synthesiscited by 7
  7. 2020Prosody Learning Mechanism for Speech Synthesis System Without Text Length Limitcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

8 papers.