mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ARTA: Collection and Classification of Ambiguous Requests and Thoughtful Actions

arXiv 2106.07999 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2021cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human-assisting systems such as dialogue systems must take thoughtful, appropriate actions not only for clear and unambiguous user requests, but also for ambiguous user requests, even if the users themselves are not aware of their potential requirements. To construct such a dialogue agent, we collected a corpus and developed a model that classifies ambiguous user requests into corresponding system actions. In order to collect a high-quality corpus, we asked workers to input antecedent user requests whose pre-defined actions could be regarded as thoughtful. Although multiple actions could be identified as thoughtful for a single user request, annotating all combinations of user requests and system actions is impractical. For this reason, we fully annotated only the test data and left the annotation of the training data incomplete. In order to train the classification model on such training data, we applied the positive/unlabeled (PU) learning method, which assumes that only a part of the data is labeled with positive examples. The experimental results show that the PU learning method achieved better performance than the general positive/negative (PN) learning method to classify thoughtful actions given an ambiguous user request.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2021.

Builds on

14 of 34 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  5. 2018MultiWOZ -- A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Wizard-of-Oz Dataset for Task-Oriented Dialogue Modellingcited by 766
  6. 2019Transferable Multi-Domain State Generator for Task-Oriented Dialogue Systemscited by 216
  7. 2018Towards Deep Conversational Recommendationscited by 176
  8. 2017Key-Value Retrieval Networks for Task-Oriented Dialoguecited by 138
  9. 2016Learning End-to-End Goal-Oriented Dialogcited by 104
  10. 2017Frames: A Corpus for Adding Memory to Goal-Oriented Dialogue Systemscited by 85
  11. 2018Mem2Seq: Effectively Incorporating Knowledge Bases into End-to-End Task-Oriented Dialog Systemscited by 70
  12. 2019Recommendation as a Communication Game: Self-Supervised Bot-Play for Goal-oriented Dialoguecited by 44
2 more
  1. 2019Hierarchical Multi-Task Natural Language Understanding for Cross-domain Conversational AI: HERMIT NLUcited by 13
  2. 2017Sequential Dialogue Context Modeling for Spoken Language Understandingcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.