mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can BERT Dig It? -- Named Entity Recognition for Information Retrieval in the Archaeology Domain

arXiv 2106.07742 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2021cs.IR cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The amount of archaeological literature is growing rapidly. Until recently, these data were only accessible through metadata search. We implemented a text retrieval engine for a large archaeological text collection (~ 658 Million words). In archaeological IR, domain-specific entities such as locations, time periods, and artefacts, play a central role. This motivated the development of a named entity recognition (NER) model to annotate the full collection with archaeological named entities. In this paper, we present ArcheoBERTje, a BERT model pre-trained on Dutch archaeological texts. We compare the model's quality and output on a Named Entity Recognition task to a generic multilingual model and a generic Dutch model. We also investigate ensemble methods for combining multiple BERT models, and combining the best BERT model with a domain thesaurus using Conditional Random Fields (CRF). We find that ArcheoBERTje outperforms both the multilingual and Dutch model significantly with a smaller standard deviation between runs, reaching an average F1 score of 0.735. The model also outperforms ensemble methods combining the three models. Combining ArcheoBERTje predictions and explicit domain knowledge from the thesaurus did not increase the F1 score. We quantitatively and qualitatively analyse the differences between the vocabulary and output of the BERT models on the full collection and provide some valuable insights in the effect of fine-tuning for specific domains. Our results indicate that for a highly specific text domain such as archaeology, further pre-training on domain-specific data increases the model's quality on NER by a much larger margin than shown for other domains in the literature, and that domain-specific pre-training makes the addition of domain knowledge from a thesaurus unnecessary.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2021.

Builds on

18 of 66 references.

References · 18

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  3. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  4. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,947
  5. 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,414
  6. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,254
  7. 2020LUKE: Deep Contextualized Entity Representations with Entity-aware Self-attentioncited by 326
  8. 2020Are All Languages Created Equal in Multilingual BERT?cited by 207
  9. 2020German's Next Language Modelcited by 144
  10. 2019Multilingual is not enough: BERT for Finnishcited by 119
  11. 2019Adaptation of Deep Bidirectional Multilingual Transformers for Russian Languagecited by 109
  12. 2019BERTje: A Dutch BERT Modelcited by 109
6 more
  1. 2020RobBERT: a Dutch RoBERTa-based Language Modelcited by 88
  2. 2019Portuguese Named Entity Recognition using BERT-CRFcited by 73
  3. 2020What the [MASK]? Making Sense of Language-Specific BERT Modelscited by 44
  4. 2019Towards Lingua Franca Named Entity Recognition with BERTcited by 11
  5. 2020An End-to-End Solution for Named Entity Recognition in eCommerce Searchcited by 6
  6. 2020Named entity recognition in chemical patents using ensemble of contextual language modelscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

5 papers.