mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Relaxing Local Robustness

arXiv 2106.06624 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2021cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Certifiable local robustness, which rigorously precludes small-norm adversarial examples, has received significant attention as a means of addressing security concerns in deep learning. However, for some classification problems, local robustness is not a natural objective, even in the presence of adversaries; for example, if an image contains two classes of subjects, the correct label for the image may be considered arbitrary between the two, and thus enforcing strict separation between them is unnecessary. In this work, we introduce two relaxed safety properties for classifiers that address this observation: (1) relaxed top-k robustness, which serves as the analogue of top-k accuracy; and (2) affinity robustness, which specifies which sets of labels must be separated by a robustness margin, and which can be ε-close in ℓp space. We show how to construct models that can be efficiently certified against each relaxed robustness property, and trained with very little overhead relative to standard gradient descent. Finally, we demonstrate experimentally that these relaxed variants of robustness are well-suited to several significant classification problems, leading to lower rejection rates and higher certified accuracies than can be obtained when certifying "standard" local robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2021.

Builds on

22 of 34 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  4. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  5. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  6. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
  7. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
  8. 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 462
  9. 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 439
  10. 2018Certified Defenses against Adversarial Examplescited by 305
  11. 2018Sorting out Lipschitz function approximationcited by 211
  12. 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 182
10 more
  1. 2018Scaling provable adversarial defensescited by 141
  2. 2021Globally-Robust Neural Networkscited by 106
  3. 2017Exploring the Landscape of Spatial Robustnesscited by 81
  4. 2018Training for Faster Adversarial Robustness Verification via Inducing ReLU Stabilitycited by 67
  5. 2019Certified Robustness for Top-k Predictions against Adversarial Perturbations via Randomized Smoothingcited by 54
  6. 2018Provable Robustness of ReLU networks via Maximization of Linear Regionscited by 51
  7. 2018Smooth Loss Functions for Deep Top-k Classificationcited by 46
  8. 2019Provable robustness against all adversarial lp-perturbations for p≥ 1cited by 39
  9. 2019Provable Certificates for Adversarial Examples: Fitting a Ball in the Union of Polytopescited by 25
  10. 2020Fast Geometric Projections for Local Robustness Certificationcited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.