mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Limitations of Piecewise Linearity for Efficient Robustness Certification

arXiv 2301.08842 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2023cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Certified defenses against small-norm adversarial examples have received growing attention in recent years; though certified accuracies of state-of-the-art methods remain far below their non-robust counterparts, despite the fact that benchmark datasets have been shown to be well-separated at far larger radii than the literature generally attempts to certify. In this work, we offer insights that identify potential factors in this performance gap. Specifically, our analysis reveals that piecewise linearity imposes fundamental limitations on the tightness of leading certification techniques. These limitations are felt in practical terms as a greater need for capacity in models hoped to be certified efficiently. Moreover, this is in addition to the capacity necessary to learn a robust boundary, studied in prior work. However, we argue that addressing the limitations of piecewise linearity through scaling up model capacity may give rise to potential difficulties -- particularly regarding robust generalization -- therefore, we conclude by suggesting that developing smooth activation functions may be the way forward for advancing the performance of certified neural networks.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2023.

Builds on

27 of 35 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  3. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  4. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  5. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
  6. 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 659
  7. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 567
  8. 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 468
  9. 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 445
  10. 2018On the Optimization of Deep Networks: Implicit Acceleration by Overparameterizationcited by 284
  11. 2018Towards Fast Computation of Certified Robustness for ReLU Networkscited by 255
  12. 2018Sorting out Lipschitz function approximationcited by 213
15 more
  1. 2021A Universal Law of Robustness via Isoperimetrycited by 151
  2. 2020Randomized Smoothing of All Shapes and Sizescited by 147
  3. 2018Scaling provable adversarial defensescited by 143
  4. 2019A Convex Relaxation Barrier to Tight Robustness Verification of Neural Networkscited by 125
  5. 2021Globally-Robust Neural Networkscited by 108
  6. 2021Orthogonalizing Convolutional Layers with the Cayley Transformcited by 105
  7. 2019Preventing Gradient Attenuation in Lipschitz Constrained Convolutional Networkscited by 87
  8. 2018Training for Faster Adversarial Robustness Verification via Inducing ReLU Stabilitycited by 67
  9. 2021Training Certifiably Robust Neural Networks with Efficient Local Lipschitz Boundscited by 65
  10. 2018Provable Robustness of ReLU networks via Maximization of Linear Regionscited by 51
  11. 2018Limitations of the Lipschitz constant as a defense against adversarial examplescited by 49
  12. 2021Improved deterministic l2 robustness on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100cited by 47
  13. 2019Provable Certificates for Adversarial Examples: Fitting a Ball in the Union of Polytopescited by 25
  14. 2020Fast Geometric Projections for Local Robustness Certificationcited by 21
  15. 2021Relaxing Local Robustnesscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4.

4 papers.