mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

To Beam Or Not To Beam: That is a Question of Cooperation for Language GANs

arXiv 2106.06363 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2021cs.CL cs.AIcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Due to the discrete nature of words, language GANs require to be optimized from rewards provided by discriminator networks, via reinforcement learning methods. This is a much harder setting than for continuous tasks, which enjoy gradient flows from discriminators to generators, usually leading to dramatic learning instabilities. However, we claim that this can be solved by making discriminator and generator networks cooperate to produce output sequences during training. These cooperative outputs, inherently built to obtain higher discrimination scores, not only provide denser rewards for training, but also form a more compact artificial set for discriminator training, hence improving its accuracy and stability. In this paper, we show that our SelfGAN framework, built on this cooperative principle, outperforms Teacher Forcing and obtains state-of-the-art results on two challenging tasks, Summarization and Question Generation.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2021.

Builds on

34 of 48 references.

References · 34

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  4. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  5. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
  6. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,475
  7. 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,353
  8. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,292
  9. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  10. 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,120
  11. 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 812
  12. 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 803
22 more
  1. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 674
  2. 2019Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generationcited by 670
  3. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 576
  4. 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
  5. 2017Towards Principled Methods for Training Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 464
  6. 2016SeqGAN: Sequence Generative Adversarial Nets with Policy Gradientcited by 376
  7. 2017A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 365
  8. 2021QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluationcited by 244
  9. 2017Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLGcited by 233
  10. 2016Professor Forcing: A New Algorithm for Training Recurrent Networkscited by 216
  11. 2017Adversarial Learning for Neural Dialogue Generationcited by 103
  12. 2018Language GANs Falling Shortcited by 97
  13. 2020Residual Energy-Based Models for Text Generationcited by 95
  14. 2020Self-Distillation as Instance-Specific Label Smoothingcited by 71
  15. 2021Machine Translation Decoding beyond Beam Searchcited by 55
  16. 2017Maximum-Likelihood Augmented Discrete Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 39
  17. 2019Training language GANs from Scratchcited by 31
  18. 2018On Accurate Evaluation of GANs for Language Generationcited by 20
  19. 2020Discriminative Adversarial Search for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 14
  20. 2020ColdGANs: Taming Language GANs with Cautious Sampling Strategiescited by 12
  21. 2020Self-Adversarial Learning with Comparative Discrimination for Text Generationcited by 11
  22. 2019Discourse Understanding and Factual Consistency in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 6; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: