mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AI-enabled Automation for Completeness Checking of Privacy Policies

arXiv 2106.05688 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2021cs.CR cs.AI cs.SEcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Technological advances in information sharing have raised concerns about data protection. Privacy policies contain privacy-related requirements about how the personal data of individuals will be handled by an organization or a software system (e.g., a web service or an app). In Europe, privacy policies are subject to compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). A prerequisite for GDPR compliance checking is to verify whether the content of a privacy policy is complete according to the provisions of GDPR. Incomplete privacy policies might result in large fines on violating organization as well as incomplete privacy-related software specifications. Manual completeness checking is both time-consuming and error-prone. In this paper, we propose AI-based automation for the completeness checking of privacy policies. Through systematic qualitative methods, we first build two artifacts to characterize the privacy-related provisions of GDPR, namely a conceptual model and a set of completeness criteria. Then, we develop an automated solution on top of these artifacts by leveraging a combination of natural language processing and supervised machine learning. Specifically, we identify the GDPR-relevant information content in privacy policies and subsequently check them against the completeness criteria. To evaluate our approach, we collected 234 real privacy policies from the fund industry. Over a set of 48 unseen privacy policies, our approach detected 300 of the total of 334 violations of some completeness criteria correctly, while producing 23 false positives. The approach thus has a precision of 92.9% and recall of 89.8%. Compared to a baseline that applies keyword search only, our approach results in an improvement of 24.5% in precision and 38% in recall.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2021.

Builds on

14 of 79 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  3. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
  4. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
  5. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
  6. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
  7. 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 205
  8. 2018When and Why are Pre-trained Word Embeddings Useful for Neural Machine Translation?cited by 125
  9. 2018CLAUDETTE: an Automated Detector of Potentially Unfair Clauses in Online Terms of Servicecited by 72
  10. 2015Towards Universal Paraphrastic Sentence Embeddingscited by 59
  11. 2016Are Word Embedding-based Features Useful for Sarcasm Detection?cited by 14
  12. 2020An Empirical Evaluation of GDPR Compliance Violations in Android mHealth Appscited by 6
2 more
  1. 2017Designing Privacy-aware Internet of Things Applicationscited by 1
  2. 2020Model Driven Engineering for Data Protection and Privacy: Application and Experience with GDPRcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

7 papers.