Neural Supervised Domain Adaptation by Augmenting Pre-trained Models with Random Units
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural Transfer Learning (TL) is becoming ubiquitous in Natural Language Processing (NLP), thanks to its high performance on many tasks, especially in low-resourced scenarios. Notably, TL is widely used for neural domain adaptation to transfer valuable knowledge from high-resource to low-resource domains. In the standard fine-tuning scheme of TL, a model is initially pre-trained on a source domain and subsequently fine-tuned on a target domain and, therefore, source and target domains are trained using the same architecture. In this paper, we show through interpretation methods that such scheme, despite its efficiency, is suffering from a main limitation. Indeed, although capable of adapting to new domains, pre-trained neurons struggle with learning certain patterns that are specific to the target domain. Moreover, we shed light on the hidden negative transfer occurring despite the high relatedness between source and target domains, which may mitigate the final gain brought by transfer learning. To address these problems, we propose to augment the pre-trained model with normalised, weighted and randomly initialised units that foster a better adaptation while maintaining the valuable source knowledge. We show that our approach exhibits significant improvements to the standard fine-tuning scheme for neural domain adaptation from the news domain to the social media domain on four NLP tasks: part-of-speech tagging, chunking, named entity recognition and morphosyntactic tagging.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 65 of its 123 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2021.
Builds on
65 of 123 references.
References · 65
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,290
- 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,162
- 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
38 more
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
- 2020AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learningcited by 788
- 2017Learning multiple visual domains with residual adapterscited by 557
- 2017Word Translation Without Parallel Datacited by 487
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 457
- 2020MAD-X: An Adapter-Based Framework for Multi-Task Cross-Lingual Transfercited by 445
- 2020AdapterHub: A Framework for Adapting Transformerscited by 444
- 2017Supervised Learning of Universal Sentence Representations from Natural Language Inference Datacited by 432
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 383
- 2020BERTweet: A pre-trained language model for English Tweetscited by 346
- 2016End-to-end Sequence Labeling via Bi-directional LSTM-CNNs-CRFcited by 341
- 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 324
- 2018Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 277
- 2018Characterizing and Avoiding Negative Transfercited by 229
- 2015Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?cited by 220
- 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
- 2014Object Detectors Emerge in Deep Scene CNNscited by 179
- 2015ParseNet: Looking Wider to See Bettercited by 177
- 2019To Tune or Not to Tune? Adapting Pretrained Representations to Diverse Taskscited by 167
- 2015Visualizing and Understanding Recurrent Networkscited by 160
- 2017Learning to Generate Reviews and Discovering Sentimentcited by 148
- 2020Explaining Black Box Predictions and Unveiling Data Artifacts through Influence Functionscited by 144
- 2020What Happens To BERT Embeddings During Fine-tuning?cited by 113
- 2018Identifying and Controlling Important Neurons in Neural Machine Translationcited by 111
- 2017Learned in Translation: Contextualized Word Vectorscited by 104
- 2017Interpreting Deep Visual Representations via Network Dissectioncited by 103
- 2019The emergence of number and syntax units in LSTM language modelscited by 94
- 2017Semi-supervised sequence tagging with bidirectional language modelscited by 86
- 2017Partial Transfer Learning with Selective Adversarial Networkscited by 85
- 2020Similarity Analysis of Contextual Word Representation Modelscited by 54
- 2018Learning General Purpose Distributed Sentence Representations via Large Scale Multi-task Learningcited by 52
- 2016Adversarial Deep Averaging Networks for Cross-Lingual Sentiment Classificationcited by 48
- 2016Unsupervised Pretraining for Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 47
- 2019Growing a Brain: Fine-Tuning by Increasing Model Capacitycited by 43
- 2016Representation of linguistic form and function in recurrent neural networkscited by 39
- 2016Multi-Source Neural Translationcited by 37
- 2018Revisiting the Importance of Individual Units in CNNs via Ablationcited by 32
- 2016Multilingual Part-of-Speech Tagging with Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Models and Auxiliary Losscited by 30
50 most cited of 65 All 65 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1.
2 papers.