mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Diversity driven Query Rewriting in Search Advertising

arXiv 2106.03816 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2021cs.CL cs.AI cs.ITcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieving keywords (bidwords) with the same intent as query, referred to as close variant keywords, is of prime importance for effective targeted search advertising. For head and torso search queries, sponsored search engines use a huge repository of same intent queries and keywords, mined ahead of time. Online, this repository is used to rewrite the query and then lookup the rewrite in a repository of bid keywords contributing to significant revenue. Recently generative retrieval models have been shown to be effective at the task of generating such query rewrites. We observe two main limitations of such generative models. First, rewrites generated by these models exhibit low lexical diversity, and hence the rewrites fail to retrieve relevant keywords that have diverse linguistic variations. Second, there is a misalignment between the training objective - the likelihood of training data, v/s what we desire - improved quality and coverage of rewrites. In this work, we introduce CLOVER, a framework to generate both high-quality and diverse rewrites by optimizing for human assessment of rewrite quality using our diversity-driven reinforcement learning algorithm. We use an evaluation model, trained to predict human judgments, as the reward function to finetune the generation policy. We empirically show the effectiveness of our proposed approach through offline experiments on search queries across geographies spanning three major languages. We also perform online A/B experiments on Bing, a large commercial search engine, which shows (i) better user engagement with an average increase in clicks by 12.83% accompanied with an average defect reduction by 13.97%, and (ii) improved revenue by 21.29%.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2021.

Builds on

26 of 51 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  3. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
  4. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  5. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  6. 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,077
  7. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 576
  8. 2016How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generationcited by 356
  9. 2019MASS: Masked Sequence to Sequence Pre-training for Language Generationcited by 347
  10. 2016Diverse Beam Search: Decoding Diverse Solutions from Neural Sequence Modelscited by 301
  11. 2017Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLGcited by 233
  12. 2020ProphetNet: Predicting Future N-gram for Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-trainingcited by 222
14 more
  1. 2019Stochastic Beams and Where to Find Them: The Gumbel-Top-k Trick for Sampling Sequences Without Replacementcited by 211
  2. 2020A Survey of Evaluation Metrics Used for NLG Systemscited by 164
  3. 2016An Actor-Critic Algorithm for Sequence Predictioncited by 159
  4. 2019Better Rewards Yield Better Summaries: Learning to Summarise Without Referencescited by 77
  5. 2017Reinforcement Learning for Bandit Neural Machine Translation with Simulated Human Feedbackcited by 72
  6. 2018Can Neural Machine Translation be Improved with User Feedback?cited by 72
  7. 2018Learning to Extract Coherent Summary via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 64
  8. 2020Improving Dialog Evaluation with a Multi-reference Adversarial Dataset and Large Scale Pretrainingcited by 59
  9. 2016A Simple, Fast Diverse Decoding Algorithm for Neural Generationcited by 58
  10. 2017Neural Models for Information Retrievalcited by 29
  11. 2016Scalable Semantic Matching of Queries to Ads in Sponsored Search Advertisingcited by 12
  12. 2019An end-to-end Generative Retrieval Method for Sponsored Search Engine --Decoding Efficiently into a Closed Target Domaincited by 12
  13. 2020ProphetNet-Ads: A Looking Ahead Strategy for Generative Retrieval Models in Sponsored Search Enginecited by 11
  14. 2019Domain-Constrained Advertising Keyword Generationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: