mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multi-armed Bandit Requiring Monotone Arm Sequences

arXiv 2106.03790 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In many online learning or multi-armed bandit problems, the taken actions or pulled arms are ordinal and required to be monotone over time. Examples include dynamic pricing, in which the firms use markup pricing policies to please early adopters and deter strategic waiting, and clinical trials, in which the dose allocation usually follows the dose escalation principle to prevent dose limiting toxicities. We consider the continuum-armed bandit problem when the arm sequence is required to be monotone. We show that when the unknown objective function is Lipschitz continuous, the regret is O(T). When in addition the objective function is unimodal or quasiconcave, the regret is tilde O(T3/4) under the proposed algorithm, which is also shown to be the optimal rate. This deviates from the optimal rate tilde O(T2/3) in the continuous-armed bandit literature and demonstrates the cost to the learning efficiency brought by the monotonicity requirement.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2021.

Builds on

8 of 47 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 433
  2. 2015Multi-armed Bandit Models for the Optimal Design of Clinical Trials: Benefits and Challengescited by 114
  3. 2014Unimodal Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 37
  4. 2019Bootstrapping Upper Confidence Boundcited by 36
  5. 2020Fairness in Learning-Based Sequential Decision Algorithms: A Surveycited by 35
  6. 2018Garbage In, Reward Out: Bootstrapping Exploration in Multi-Armed Banditscited by 34
  7. 2019Smooth Contextual Bandits: Bridging the Parametric and Non-differentiable Regret Regimescited by 25
  8. 2017Thresholding Bandit for Dose-ranging: The Impact of Monotonicitycited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4.

5 papers.