A Primer on Multi-Neuron Relaxation-based Adversarial Robustness Certification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The existence of adversarial examples poses a real danger when deep neural networks are deployed in the real world. The go-to strategy to quantify this vulnerability is to evaluate the model against specific attack algorithms. This approach is however inherently limited, as it says little about the robustness of the model against more powerful attacks not included in the evaluation. We develop a unified mathematical framework to describe relaxation-based robustness certification methods, which go beyond adversary-specific robustness evaluation and instead provide provable robustness guarantees against attacks by any adversary. We discuss the fundamental limitations posed by single-neuron relaxations and show how the recent ``k-ReLU'' multi-neuron relaxation framework of Singh et al. (2019) obtains tighter correlation-aware activation bounds by leveraging additional relational constraints among groups of neurons. Specifically, we show how additional pre-activation bounds can be mapped to corresponding post-activation bounds and how they can in turn be used to obtain tighter robustness certificates. We also present an intuitive way to visualize different relaxation-based certification methods. By approximating multiple non-linearities jointly instead of separately, the k-ReLU method is able to bypass the convex barrier imposed by single neuron relaxations.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2021.
Builds on
29 of 38 references.
References · 29
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
- 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
- 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
17 more
- 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 439
- 2018Certified Defenses against Adversarial Examplescited by 305
- 2018Towards Fast Computation of Certified Robustness for ReLU Networkscited by 254
- 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 244
- 2017Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networkscited by 241
- 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
- 2017Formal Guarantees on the Robustness of a Classifier against Adversarial Manipulationcited by 182
- 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
- 2018Scaling provable adversarial defensescited by 141
- 2017An approach to reachability analysis for feed-forward ReLU neural networkscited by 126
- 2018A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networkscited by 125
- 2019A Convex Relaxation Barrier to Tight Robustness Verification of Neural Networkscited by 124
- 2017Maximum Resilience of Artificial Neural Networkscited by 97
- 2019The Odds are Odd: A Statistical Test for Detecting Adversarial Examplescited by 75
- 2020The Convex Relaxation Barrier, Revisited: Tightened Single-Neuron Relaxations for Neural Network Verificationcited by 50
- 2019Verification of Non-Linear Specifications for Neural Networkscited by 14
- 2019On Certifying Non-uniform Bound against Adversarial Attackscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.