mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

F-Drop&Match: GANs with a Dead Zone in the High-Frequency Domain

arXiv 2106.02343 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2021cs.CV cs.LG eess.IVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative adversarial networks built from deep convolutional neural networks (GANs) lack the ability to exactly replicate the high-frequency components of natural images. To alleviate this issue, we introduce two novel training techniques called frequency dropping (F-Drop) and frequency matching (F-Match). The key idea of F-Drop is to filter out unnecessary high-frequency components from the input images of the discriminators. This simple modification prevents the discriminators from being confused by perturbations of the high-frequency components. In addition, F-Drop makes the GANs focus on fitting in the low-frequency domain, in which there are the dominant components of natural images. F-Match minimizes the difference between real and fake images in the frequency domain for generating more realistic images. F-Match is implemented as a regularization term in the objective functions of the generators; it penalizes the batch mean error in the frequency domain. F-Match helps the generators to fit in the high-frequency domain filtered out by F-Drop to the real image. We experimentally demonstrate that the combination of F-Drop and F-Match improves the generative performance of GANs in both the frequency and spatial domain on multiple image benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2021.

Builds on

24 of 33 references.

References · 24

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  5. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
  6. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
  7. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
  8. 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,048
  9. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
  10. 2018Demystifying MMD GANscited by 1,268
  11. 2020Training Generative Adversarial Networks with Limited Datacited by 1,184
  12. 2019StarGAN v2: Diverse Image Synthesis for Multiple Domainscited by 1,095
12 more
  1. 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 501
  2. 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
  3. 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
  4. 2020Watch your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks are Failing to Reproduce Spectral Distributionscited by 278
  5. 2018cGANs with Projection Discriminatorcited by 253
  6. 2017MMD GAN: Towards Deeper Understanding of Moment Matching Networkcited by 251
  7. 2020Learning in the Frequency Domaincited by 196
  8. 2019Consistency Regularization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 134
  9. 2020SSD-GAN: Measuring the Realness in the Spatial and Spectral Domainscited by 38
  10. 2020InfoMax-GAN: Improved Adversarial Image Generation via Information Maximization and Contrastive Learningcited by 37
  11. 2018On the Structural Sensitivity of Deep Convolutional Networks to the Directions of Fourier Basis Functionscited by 31
  12. 2020Mimicry: Towards the Reproducibility of GAN Researchcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.