mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Consistent Two-Flow Network for Tele-Registration of Point Clouds

arXiv 2106.00329 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2021cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Rigid registration of partial observations is a fundamental problem in various applied fields. In computer graphics, special attention has been given to the registration between two partial point clouds generated by scanning devices. State-of-the-art registration techniques still struggle when the overlap region between the two point clouds is small, and completely fail if there is no overlap between the scan pairs. In this paper, we present a learning-based technique that alleviates this problem, and allows registration between point clouds, presented in arbitrary poses, and having little or even no overlap, a setting that has been referred to as tele-registration. Our technique is based on a novel neural network design that learns a prior of a class of shapes and can complete a partial shape. The key idea is combining the registration and completion tasks in a way that reinforces each other. In particular, we simultaneously train the registration network and completion network using two coupled flows, one that register-and-complete, and one that complete-and-register, and encourage the two flows to produce a consistent result. We show that, compared with each separate flow, this two-flow training leads to robust and reliable tele-registration, and hence to a better point cloud prediction that completes the registered scans. It is also worth mentioning that each of the components in our neural network outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both completion and registration. We further analyze our network with several ablation studies and demonstrate its performance on a large number of partial point clouds, both synthetic and real-world, that have only small or no overlap.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2021.

Builds on

22 of 38 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  2. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,897
  3. 2018Open3D: A Modern Library for 3D Data Processingcited by 721
  4. 2018PCN: Point Completion Networkcited by 384
  5. 2019Deep Closest Point: Learning Representations for Point Cloud Registrationcited by 321
  6. 2016DSAC - Differentiable RANSAC for Camera Localizationcited by 266
  7. 2019PointNetLK: Robust & Efficient Point Cloud Registration using PointNetcited by 233
  8. 2020Deep Global Registrationcited by 229
  9. 2018Pix3D: Dataset and Methods for Single-Image 3D Shape Modelingcited by 218
  10. 2020RPM-Net: Robust Point Matching using Learned Featurescited by 182
  11. 2019PRNet: Self-Supervised Learning for Partial-to-Partial Registrationcited by 146
  12. 2020PF-Net: Point Fractal Network for 3D Point Cloud Completioncited by 146
10 more
  1. 2019Morphing and Sampling Network for Dense Point Cloud Completioncited by 132
  2. 2016BundleFusion: Real-time Globally Consistent 3D Reconstruction using On-the-fly Surface Re-integrationcited by 116
  3. 2020Cascaded Refinement Network for Point Cloud Completioncited by 112
  4. 20183DFeat-Net: Weakly Supervised Local 3D Features for Point Cloud Registrationcited by 103
  5. 2015Render for CNN: Viewpoint Estimation in Images Using CNNs Trained with Rendered 3D Model Viewscited by 94
  6. 2016A Large Dataset of Object Scanscited by 64
  7. 2019Unsupervised cycle-consistent deformation for shape matchingcited by 23
  8. 2018Extreme Relative Pose Estimation for RGB-D Scans via Scene Completioncited by 22
  9. 2019Extreme Relative Pose Network under Hybrid Representationscited by 19
  10. 2018ALIGNet: Partial-Shape Agnostic Alignment via Unsupervised Learningcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3.

5 papers.