Entropy-based adaptive design for contour finding and estimating reliability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In reliability analysis, methods used to estimate failure probability are often limited by the costs associated with model evaluations. Many of these methods, such as multifidelity importance sampling (MFIS), rely upon a computationally efficient, surrogate model like a Gaussian process (GP) to quickly generate predictions. The quality of the GP fit, particularly in the vicinity of the failure region(s), is instrumental in supplying accurately predicted failures for such strategies. We introduce an entropy-based GP adaptive design that, when paired with MFIS, provides more accurate failure probability estimates and with higher confidence. We show that our greedy data acquisition strategy better identifies multiple failure regions compared to existing contour-finding schemes. We then extend the method to batch selection, without sacrificing accuracy. Illustrative examples are provided on benchmark data as well as an application to an impact damage simulator for National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) spacesuits.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2021.
Builds on
9 of 79 references.
References · 9
- 2018Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimizationcited by 142
- 2013Local Gaussian process approximation for large computer experimentscited by 59
- 2017Bayesian Optimization with Gradientscited by 59
- 2016Truncated Variance Reduction: A Unified Approach to Bayesian Optimization and Level-Set Estimationcited by 40
- 2016Adaptive Design of Experiments for Conservative Estimation of Excursion Setscited by 10
- 2018Contour location via entropy reduction leveraging multiple information sourcescited by 10
- 2018Evaluating Gaussian Process Metamodels and Sequential Designs for Noisy Level Set Estimationcited by 10
- 2018Distance-distributed design for Gaussian process surrogatescited by 7
- 2015Quantifying uncertainties on excursion sets under a Gaussian random field priorcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2022Bayesian Active Learning with Fully Bayesian Gaussian Processescited by 26
- 2021Triangulation candidates for Bayesian optimizationcited by 11
- 2022Bayesian sequential design of computer experiments for quantile set inversioncited by 2
- 2025CRPS-Based Targeted Sequential Design with Application in Chemical Spacecited by 2
- 2025Informed Initialization for Bayesian Optimization and Active Learningcited by 2
- 2026REMAL: Residual Equilibrium Manifold Active Learning for Surrogate-Based Multidisciplinary Design Analysiscited by 1
- 2024Multifidelity Cross-validationcited by 0
- 2025An (ε,δ)-accurate level set estimation with a stopping criterioncited by 0
- 2025Bayesian Active Learning of (small) Quantile Sets through Expected Estimator Modificationcited by 0
- 2025Actively Learning Joint Contours of Multiple Computer Experimentscited by 0
- 2026REMAL: Residual Equilibrium Manifold Active Learning for Surrogate-Based Multidisciplinary Design Analysis11 Jun 2026
- 2025Actively Learning Joint Contours of Multiple Computer Experiments15 Dec 2025
- 2025Informed Initialization for Bayesian Optimization and Active Learning27 Oct 2025
- 2025Bayesian Active Learning of (small) Quantile Sets through Expected Estimator Modification16 Jun 2025
- 2025An (ε,δ)-accurate level set estimation with a stopping criterion26 Mar 2025
- 2025CRPS-Based Targeted Sequential Design with Application in Chemical Space14 Mar 2025
- 2024Multifidelity Cross-validation1 Jul 2024
- 2022Bayesian sequential design of computer experiments for quantile set inversion2 Nov 2022
- 2022Bayesian Active Learning with Fully Bayesian Gaussian Processes20 May 2022
- 2021Triangulation candidates for Bayesian optimization14 Dec 2021