mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An (ε,δ)-accurate level set estimation with a stopping criterion

arXiv 2503.20272 ↗First posted 26 Mar 2025stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The level set estimation problem seeks to identify regions within a set of candidate points where an unknown and costly to evaluate function's value exceeds a specified threshold, providing an efficient alternative to exhaustive evaluations of function values. Traditional methods often use sequential optimization strategies to find ε-accurate solutions, which permit a margin around the threshold contour but frequently lack effective stopping criteria, leading to excessive exploration and inefficiencies. This paper introduces an acquisition strategy for level set estimation that incorporates a stopping criterion, ensuring the algorithm halts when further exploration is unlikely to yield improvements, thereby reducing unnecessary function evaluations. We theoretically prove that our method satisfies ε-accuracy with a confidence level of 1 - δ, addressing a key gap in existing approaches. Furthermore, we show that this also leads to guarantees on the lower bounds of performance metrics such as F-score. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed acquisition function achieves comparable precision to existing methods while confirming that the stopping criterion effectively terminates the algorithm once adequate exploration is completed.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2025.

Builds on

24 of 51 references.

References · 24

  1. 2016Truncated Variance Reduction: A Unified Approach to Bayesian Optimization and Level-Set Estimationcited by 40
  2. 2014A Method for Stopping Active Learning Based on Stabilizing Predictions and the Need for User-Adjustable Stoppingcited by 21
  3. 2021Automatic Termination for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 21
  4. 2016A supermartingale approach to Gaussian process based sequential design of experimentscited by 20
  5. 2020Stopping criterion for active learning based on deterministic generalization boundscited by 20
  6. 2021Nearly Optimal Algorithms for Level Set Estimationcited by 17
  7. 2018Robust Super-Level Set Estimation using Gaussian Processescited by 15
  8. 2020An Information-Theoretic Framework for Unifying Active Learning Problemscited by 14
  9. 2024Stopping Bayesian Optimization with Probabilistic Regret Boundscited by 11
  10. 2016Adaptive Design of Experiments for Conservative Estimation of Excursion Setscited by 10
  11. 2018Contour location via entropy reduction leveraging multiple information sourcescited by 10
  12. 2018Evaluating Gaussian Process Metamodels and Sequential Designs for Noisy Level Set Estimationcited by 10
12 more
  1. 2019Multiscale Gaussian Process Level Set Estimationcited by 10
  2. 2019Bayesian Experimental Design for Finding Reliable Level Set under Input Uncertaintycited by 10
  3. 2021Active learning for distributionally robust level-set estimationcited by 10
  4. 2021Entropy-based adaptive design for contour finding and estimating reliabilitycited by 10
  5. 2019Stopping Active Learning based on Predicted Change of F Measure for Text Classificationcited by 8
  6. 2019Active learning for level set estimation under input uncertainty and its extensionscited by 7
  7. 2020The sample complexity of level set approximationcited by 6
  8. 2022Look-Ahead Acquisition Functions for Bernoulli Level Set Estimationcited by 6
  9. 2015Quantifying uncertainties on excursion sets under a Gaussian random field priorcited by 5
  10. 2015Analysis of Stopping Active Learning based on Stabilizing Predictionscited by 5
  11. 2023Adaptive Defective Area Identification in Material Surface Using Active Transfer Learning-based Level Set Estimationcited by 4
  12. 2022Bayesian sequential design of computer experiments for quantile set inversioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.