mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fact-driven Logical Reasoning for Machine Reading Comprehension

arXiv 2105.10334 ↗First posted 21 May 2021cs.CL cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent years have witnessed an increasing interest in training machines with reasoning ability, which deeply relies on accurately and clearly presented clue forms. The clues are usually modeled as entity-aware knowledge in existing studies. However, those entity-aware clues are primarily focused on commonsense, making them insufficient for tasks that require knowledge of temporary facts or events, particularly in logical reasoning for reading comprehension. To address this challenge, we are motivated to cover both commonsense and temporary knowledge clues hierarchically. Specifically, we propose a general formalism of knowledge units by extracting backbone constituents of the sentence, such as the subject-verb-object formed ``facts''. We then construct a supergraph on top of the fact units, allowing for the benefit of sentence-level (relations among fact groups) and entity-level interactions (concepts or actions inside a fact). Experimental results on logical reasoning benchmarks and dialogue modeling datasets show that our approach improves the baselines substantially, and it is general across backbone models. Code is available at urlhttps://github.com/ozyyshr/FocalReasoner.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2021.

Builds on

45 of 62 references.

References · 45

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  5. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  6. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  7. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  8. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  9. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  10. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,684
  11. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
  12. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,039
33 more
  1. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
  2. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
  3. 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 807
  4. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 798
  5. 2021QA-GNN: Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Question Answeringcited by 386
  6. 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 317
  7. 2019Abductive Commonsense Reasoningcited by 300
  8. 2019Cosmos QA: Machine Reading Comprehension with Contextual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 281
  9. 2016Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehensioncited by 278
  10. 2020Retrieve, Program, Repeat: Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via Alternate Meta-learningcited by 216
  11. 2020ReClor: A Reading Comprehension Dataset Requiring Logical Reasoningcited by 211
  12. 2017Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretationcited by 195
  13. 2017Encoding Sentences with Graph Convolutional Networks for Semantic Role Labelingcited by 137
  14. 2020Beta Embeddings for Multi-Hop Logical Reasoning in Knowledge Graphscited by 128
  15. 2020MuTual: A Dataset for Multi-Turn Dialogue Reasoningcited by 114
  16. 2018How Much Reading Does Reading Comprehension Require? A Critical Investigation of Popular Benchmarkscited by 86
  17. 2020Retrospective Reader for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 86
  18. 2016A Thorough Examination of the CNN/Daily Mail Reading Comprehension Taskcited by 71
  19. 2019Reasoning Over Semantic-Level Graph for Fact Checkingcited by 69
  20. 2019Graph-Based Reasoning over Heterogeneous External Knowledge for Commonsense Question Answeringcited by 68
  21. 2018Graph-to-Sequence Learning using Gated Graph Neural Networkscited by 61
  22. 2019SG-Net: Syntax-Guided Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 52
  23. 2021AR-LSAT: Investigating Analytical Reasoning of Textcited by 49
  24. 2019Assessing the Benchmarking Capacity of Machine Reading Comprehension Datasetscited by 46
  25. 2021Logic-Driven Context Extension and Data Augmentation for Logical Reasoning of Textcited by 46
  26. 2019Multi-hop Question Answering via Reasoning Chainscited by 42
  27. 2016Gated-Attention Readers for Text Comprehensioncited by 37
  28. 2016Attention-over-Attention Neural Networks for Reading Comprehensioncited by 31
  29. 2018Read + Verify: Machine Reading Comprehension with Unanswerable Questionscited by 31
  30. 2021DAGN: Discourse-Aware Graph Network for Logical Reasoningcited by 28
  31. 2018Exploring Graph-structured Passage Representation for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension with Graph Neural Networkscited by 23
  32. 2019Option Comparison Network for Multiple-choice Reading Comprehensioncited by 14
  33. 2019Local Reasoning for Global Graph Propertiescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2.

4 papers.