mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unpacking the Expressed Consequences of AI Research in Broader Impact Statements

arXiv 2105.04760 ↗First posted 11 May 2021cs.CYcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The computer science research community and the broader public have become increasingly aware of negative consequences of algorithmic systems. In response, the top-tier Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) conference for machine learning and artificial intelligence research required that authors include a statement of broader impact to reflect on potential positive and negative consequences of their work. We present the results of a qualitative thematic analysis of a sample of statements written for the 2020 conference. The themes we identify broadly fall into categories related to how consequences are expressed (e.g., valence, specificity, uncertainty), areas of impacts expressed (e.g., bias, the environment, labor, privacy), and researchers' recommendations for mitigating negative consequences in the future. In light of our results, we offer perspectives on how the broader impact statement can be implemented in future iterations to better align with potential goals.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 May 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 6; 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 4.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Challenges and Strategies in Cross-Cultural NLPcited by 218
  2. 2021The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Researchcited by 172
  3. 2024Concept Induction: Analyzing Unstructured Text with High-Level Concepts Using LLooMcited by 78
  4. 2022How Different Groups Prioritize Ethical Values for Responsible AIcited by 49
  5. 2024Farsight: Fostering Responsible AI Awareness During AI Application Prototypingcited by 28
  6. 2022Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Surveycited by 22
  7. 2022REAL ML: Recognizing, Exploring, and Articulating Limitations of Machine Learning Researchcited by 20
  8. 2023The Ethical Implications of Generative Audio Models: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 18
  9. 2021AI Ethics Statements -- Analysis and lessons learnt from NeurIPS Broader Impact Statementscited by 16
  10. 2025Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 16
  11. 2022Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethicscited by 12
  12. 2023Responsible AI Research Needs Impact Statements Toocited by 7
10 more
  1. 2024BLIP: Facilitating the Exploration of Undesirable Consequences of Digital Technologiescited by 6
  2. 2021Use of Formal Ethical Reviews in NLP Literature: Historical Trends and Current Practicescited by 3
  3. 2023Responsible AI Considerations in Text Summarization Research: A Review of Current Practicescited by 2
  4. 2024A Systematic Review of NeurIPS Dataset Management Practicescited by 2
  5. 2025Envisioning Stakeholder-Action Pairs to Mitigate Negative Impacts of AI: A Participatory Approach to Inform Policy Makingcited by 2
  6. 2021Addressing Privacy Threats from Machine Learningcited by 1
  7. 2022Don't "research fast and break things": On the ethics of Computational Social Sciencecited by 0
  8. 2024Evaluating the Capabilities of LLMs for Supporting Anticipatory Impact Assessmentcited by 0
  9. 2025Recognition Without Mitigation: Ethical Frameworks in Autonomous Offensive-LLM Agent Researchcited by 0
  10. 2025Societal AI Research Has Become Less Interdisciplinarycited by 0