mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

REAL ML: Recognizing, Exploring, and Articulating Limitations of Machine Learning Research

arXiv 2205.08363 ↗First posted 5 May 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transparency around limitations can improve the scientific rigor of research, help ensure appropriate interpretation of research findings, and make research claims more credible. Despite these benefits, the machine learning (ML) research community lacks well-developed norms around disclosing and discussing limitations. To address this gap, we conduct an iterative design process with 30 ML and ML-adjacent researchers to develop and test REAL ML, a set of guided activities to help ML researchers recognize, explore, and articulate the limitations of their research. Using a three-stage interview and survey study, we identify ML researchers' perceptions of limitations, as well as the challenges they face when recognizing, exploring, and articulating limitations. We develop REAL ML to address some of these practical challenges, and highlight additional cultural challenges that will require broader shifts in community norms to address. We hope our study and REAL ML help move the ML research community toward more active and appropriate engagement with limitations.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2022.

Builds on

6 of 37 references.

References · 6

  1. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  2. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  3. 2021The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Researchcited by 172
  4. 2020Value Cards: An Educational Toolkit for Teaching Social Impacts of Machine Learning through Deliberationcited by 24
  5. 2021Unpacking the Expressed Consequences of AI Research in Broader Impact Statementscited by 22
  6. 2021Thinking Through and Writing About Research Ethics Beyond "Broader Impact"cited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 6; 2024: 4; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysiscited by 200
  2. 2024Weak baselines and reporting biases lead to overoptimism in machine learning for fluid-related partial differential equationscited by 91
  3. 2025Can We Trust AI Benchmarks? An Interdisciplinary Review of Current Issues in AI Evaluationcited by 60
  4. 2024Farsight: Fostering Responsible AI Awareness During AI Application Prototypingcited by 28
  5. 2025Reality Check: A New Evaluation Ecosystem Is Necessary to Understand AI's Real World Effectscited by 19
  6. 2025Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 16
  7. 2023Investigating Practices and Opportunities for Cross-functional Collaboration around AI Fairness in Industry Practicecited by 15
  8. 2023ORES: Open-vocabulary Responsible Visual Synthesiscited by 14
  9. 2024Generative Adversarial Reviews: When LLMs Become the Criticcited by 12
  10. 2023The AI Incident Database as an Educational Tool to Raise Awareness of AI Harms: A Classroom Exploration of Efficacy, Limitations, & Future Improvementscited by 8
  11. 2023Responsible AI Research Needs Impact Statements Toocited by 7
  12. 2025Rigor in AI: Doing Rigorous AI Work Requires a Broader, Responsible AI-Informed Conception of Rigorcited by 7
8 more
  1. 2023A Systematic Literature Review of Human-Centered, Ethical, and Responsible AIcited by 6
  2. 2022Identifying the Context Shift between Test Benchmarks and Production Datacited by 5
  3. 2022A Review and Roadmap of Deep Learning Causal Discovery in Different Variable Paradigmscited by 4
  4. 2025Fine-Grained Appropriate Reliance: Human-AI Collaboration with a Multi-Step Transparent Decision Workflow for Complex Task Decompositioncited by 3
  5. 2026Scaffold, Not Vocabulary? A Controlled, Two-Tier, Pre-Registered Study of a Popperian Code-Generation Skillcited by 3
  6. 2025Talking About the Assumption in the Roomcited by 2
  7. 2024From Model Performance to Claim: How a Change of Focus in Machine Learning Replicability Can Help Bridge the Responsibility Gapcited by 1
  8. 2025Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systemscited by 0